Analyzing Small Molecule Metabolite Profiles of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Urine Samples Using GCXGC–TOF-MS and Statistical Software as a Data-Mining Strategy - - Chromatography Online
Analyzing Small Molecule Metabolite Profiles of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Urine Samples Using GCXGC–TOF-MS and Statistical Software as a Data-Mining Strategy
Small-molecule metabolite analysis presents challenges that historically have relied heavily upon standard quadrupole gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) utilizing targeted methods of selected ion monitoring and MS-MS mass spectrometric
techniques. The complex nature of metabolomic samples demands analytical solutions and instrumental methods that will identify
the small molecule metabolite profile completely as well as discover significant key components of interest.
Following two-dimensional (GC×GC)–time of flight (TOF)-MS, the data processed diabetic and nondiabetic samples were analyzed
by proprietary software.
Experimental
This research was designed to study trimethylsilyl-derivatized urine samples for the small molecule metabolite profile intended
to detect possible chemical variations between diabetic disease state and normal control nondiabetic subjects. The experimental
design for this study involved sample preparation with extraction and derivatization followed by GC×GC–TOF-MS analysis and
data processing to generate sample peak tables. Next a comparison analysis was performed (Statistical Compare function of
ChromaTOF software, LECO, St. Joseph, Michigan), and Fisher ratios were calculated for all components in the compound table.
The data results were refined to eliminate background from column bleed or derivatization matrix. The 619 analytes with the
largest Fisher ratio values were exported as a .csv file and were used in a multivariate analysis (1).
Morning fast urine samples were collected from four subjects: two nondiabetic normal controls, one type I diabetic, and one
type II diabetic. Samples were stored under refrigeration at 4 °C before liquid–liquid extraction with methylene chloride
and derivatization with N,O-bis-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA). Six 10-mL aliquots from each subject were prepared
by acidification with concentrated sulfuric acid to pH 2. Aliquots (10 mL each) were extracted with 2 mL of methlyene chloride
into a 20-mL scintillation vial containing approximately 5 mg of sodium sulfate. Derivatization was carried out with BSTFA
by placing 200 μL of extract into a sealed 2-mL autosampler vial containing approximately 0.5 mg of sodium sulfate. A 30-μL
aliquot of dry pyridine was added to the vial. A 200-μL aliquot of BSTFA was added to each vial. The samples were heated to
60 °C for 1 h and then analyzed.
Figure 1
GC×GC–TOF-MS results were generated with a Pegasus 4D time of flight mass spectrometer (LECO). The mass spectrometer was equipped
with an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California) featuring a two-stage cryogenic modulator
and a secondary oven (LECO). The software mentioned earlier was used for all acquisition control, data processing, and Fisher
ratio calculations. A 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25-μm film thickness Rtx-5ms GC capillary column (Restek Corp., Bellefonte, Pennsylvania)
was used as the primary column for the GC×GC–TOF-MS analysis. In the GC×GC configuration, a second column (1.5 m × 0.18 mm,
0.18-μm film thickness, Restek Corp.) was placed inside the secondary GC oven after the thermal modulator. The helium carrier
gas flow rate was set to 1.5 mL/min at a corrected constant flow via pressure ramps. The primary column was programmed with
an initial temperature of 40 °C for 1.00 min and ramped at 6 °C/min to 290 °C for 10 min. The secondary column temperature
program was set to an initial temperature of 50 °C for 1.00 min and then was ramped at 6 °C/min to 300 °C with a 10 min hold
time. The thermal modulator was set to +25 °C relative to the primary oven and a modulation time of 5 s was used. The MS mass
range was 45–800 m/z with an acquisition rate of 200 spectra/s. The ion source chamber temperature was set to 230 °C and the detector voltage
was 1750 V with electron energy of -70 eV.