PS-DVB Monolithic Columns Applied in A Microcolumn Switching Set-up for the Analysis of Peptides and Proteins - - Chromatography Online
PS-DVB Monolithic Columns Applied in A Microcolumn Switching Set-up for the Analysis of Peptides and Proteins


The Application Notebook



Figure 1: Direct injection (b) vs microcolumn switching with monolithic trap column of a cytochrome c digest (a) with 1 pmol injected.
Polystyrene-divinylbenzene (PS-DVB) trap columns have been evaluated for microcolumn switching applications. In contrast to traditional stationary phases, which consist of packed particles, the monolithic separation medium is made of a continuous, rigid polymeric rod with a porous structure. The absence of intraparticular void volume increases separation efficiency, allowing for faster separations. Column lifetime is higher compared to packed columns.


Figure 2: Separation of 16 intact proteins (5 ng each injected) on a monolithic capillary column after preconcentration on a monolithic trap column.
This article demonstrates that the use of monolithic trap columns for preconcentration and desalting of peptides and proteins does not negatively influence chromatographic performance or sample recovery. Sample capacity of the monolithic trap columns (200m i.d. 5 mm) is 100 pmol for both peptides and proteins.

Experimental

LC system: UltiMate Plus nano LC system, Switchos
column switching module and FAMOS
autosampler (LC Packings/Dionex)

Trap column: Monolithic trap column, PS-DVB,
200-m i.d. 5 mm

Loading solvent: Water with 0.05% hepta fluorobutyric acid
(HFBA)

Loading solvent
flow-rate: 10L/min

Analytical column: Monolithic capillary column,
PS-DVB, 200m i.d. 5 cm

Mobile phases: (a) Water, 0.05% TFA
(b) Water, acetonitrile (50:50%, v/v),
0.04% TFA

Flow-rate: 2.7L/min

Gradient: 0–70% B in 7 min for peptides
30–100% B in 25 min for proteins

Column
temperature: 60 C

UV detection: 214 nm; 3 nL flowcell

Direct Injection vs Microcolumn Switching


Table 1: PWHH for Tryptic Peptides of Cytochrome c Separated on Monolithic Columns
The influence of the monolithic trap column on chromatographic performance was evaluated by the separation of tryptic peptides of cytochrome c. Figure 1 shows a comparison between direct injection and microcolumn switching with a monolithic trap column. Table 1 lists peak widths at half height (PWHH) for the tryptic peptides with and without preconcentration.

Protein Separation After Preconcentration Using Monolithic Columns

Figure 2 shows the separation of 16 standard proteins on a monolithic capillary column with sample loading on a monolithic trap column. PWHH were typically between 4 and 8 s.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:




 

LCGC COLUMNISTS 2014

Column Watch: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments. LATEST: Avoiding Reversed-Phase Chromatography Problems Through Informed Method Development Practices: Choosing the Stationary-Phase Chemistry


Perspectives in Modern HPLC: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: Seven Common Faux Pas in Modern HPLC


MS — The Practical Art: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis


LC Troubleshooting: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: Estimating Resolution for Marginally Separated Peaks


More LCGC Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>


Source: The Application Notebook,
Click here