Solid-Phase Extraction - - Chromatography Online
Solid-Phase Extraction

LCGC North America
Volume 31, Issue 1

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is a sample cleanup and preconcentration technique used to reduce sample and chromatographic complexity or increase analytical sensitivity.


Figure 1: Steps in solid-phase extraction.
Often called "digital chromatography," the technique uses silica or polymeric stationary phase particles that are often functionalized with various ligands to offer a particular selectivity to compounds partitioning between the liquid mobile phase and solid stationary phase surface. There are many different sorbent chemistries available, including most of the popular high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) phases, ion exchangers (both weak and strong), and "mixed-mode" phases using both hydrophobic and ionic ligands. Polymers are used as mixed-mode phases and have found widespread use as "generic" phases in which a fixed protocol of solvents can be used across a wide variety of application types.

The sorbent materials are often packed into syringe barrel tubes or well-plate devices and protocol solvents are passed through the packed beds using gravity, vacuum, or positive pressure of an inert gas. The amount of sorbent is chosen to reflect the capacity required to retain the analytes of interest, although usually in SPE the mass of all sample components is considered in this calculation and not just the analyte of interest. Silica phases typically have a capacity of around 5% (w/w) by bed mass and polymers around 20% (w/w).

The majority of SPE methods — or protocols as they are often called — have six discrete stages. Sample pretreatment typically involves changing a liquid sample pH, dissolving a solid sample in a suitable solvent, or altering the sample buffer strength to ensure maximum retention by the chosen sorbent. Conditioning uses a solvent (often methanol) to activate the bonded phase on the sorbent surface and acts to avoid dewetting effects.

Equilibration prepares the sorbent surface to accept the sample, ensures optimum analyte recovery, and minimizes "breakthrough" — this might include adjusting the pH of the solvent within the sorbent bed, altering the ionic strength, or changing the type of buffer used. The adjustment of the solvent pH may also be used to control the degree of ionization for ligands containing ionogenic functional groups.

Sample loading is usually performed in a similar solvent to that used during the equilibration step, and careful control of solvent flow rate is important to ensure optimum analyte retention, especially where ionic (point to point) interactions are concerned. Flows rates of 1 mL/min are typical.

Washing steps require careful design of the protocol solvent and the eluotropic strength, ionic strength, and pH may all be adjusted to ensure that the maximum amount of potentially interfering species are removed while leaving the analyte in as tight a band as possible on the sorbent surface. The specificity of the protocol can be optimized, if required, by using ligands that undergo ion-exchange interactions where the options for chemically differentiating between analyte and interferents include pH, ionic strength, and the nature of the counterion used, thus creating cleaner final extracts. More than one washing step may be used if necessary. Method developers commonly use wash solvents that are eluotropically weaker than necessary for fear of analyte loss.

Elution protocol solvents are designed to recover the maximum amount of analyte from the stationary phase while leaving any remaining potential interferents behind, and once again, percentage of organic modifier, pH, ionic strength, and the nature of the counterion are available to maximize analyte recovery. Depending upon the nature of the wash and elution solvents and the mode of analyte retention, a soak step may be used in which the elution solvent is allowed to remain stationary for a fixed period of time, ensuring good penetration into the pores of the stationary phase, minimizing dewetting phenomena, and allowing time for the analyte to equilibrate into the elution solvent. Again, a common mistake at this stage is the use of protocol solvents that are "too strong'" and elute interfering compounds that could otherwise be left on the sorbent for fear of low analyte recovery. Both wash and elution stages should be carefully optimized to maximize selectivity of the process.

The volume of elution solvent can be altered with changing eutropic strength to achieve a concentration effect in which the analyte concentration increases with the ratio of sample volume to elution volume. If required, the elution solvent may be evaporated under an inert gas and reconstituted in a solvent more suited to the analytical technique or in a lower volume, again achieving an increase in analyte concentration. This evaporation or reconstitution step provides extra complexity and a possible reduction in precision and should be carefully considered.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:




 

LCGC COLUMNISTS 2014

Sample Prep Perspectives | Ronald E. Majors:

LCGC Columnist Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments in existing technology lines.

LATEST: The Role of Selectivity in Extractions: A Case Study

History of Chromatography | Industry Veterans:

With each installment of this column, a different industry veteran covers an aspect of the evolution and continued development of the science of chromatography, from its birth to its eventual growth into the high-powered industry we see today.

LATEST: Georges Guiochon: Separation Science Innovator

MS — The Practical Art| Kate Yu:
Kate Yu is the editor of 'MS-The Practical Art' bringing her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers.

LATEST: Mass Spectrometry for Natural Products Research: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities


LC Troubleshooting | John Dolan:

LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan, Vice President of LC Resources and world renowned expert on HPLC, is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them.

LATEST: LC Method Scaling, Part I: Isocratic Separations

More LCGC Chromatography-Related Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>


Source: LCGC North America,
Click here