Field-Flow Fractionation for Biological, Natural, and Synthetic Polymers: Recent Advances and Trends - - Chromatography Online
Field-Flow Fractionation for Biological, Natural, and Synthetic Polymers: Recent Advances and Trends

LCGC North America
Volume 31, Issue 12, pp. 1008-1017

Field-flow fractionation (FFF) is a family of techniques that is increasingly used for separating and characterizing macromolecules. This review discusses recent advances in the characterization of biological, natural, and synthetic polymers. Applications of FFF are contrasted with size-exclusion chromatography to illustrate practical considerations when characterizing macromolecules. The use of different FFF fields allows separations based on size, mass, composition, and architecture. The open channel design and subsequent low shear rate is well suited for analyzing weakly bound complexes, highly branched polymers, high molar mass analytes, and aggregates. Other benefits of FFF that are highlighted in this article include simplified sample preparation, flexibility in carrier fluid choice, and on-line removal of low-molecular-weight contaminants.

Figure 1: Types of FFF separation. (a) In AF4 a crossflow passes through a semipermeable membrane and porous frit. (b) In HF5 a cylindrical semipermeable membrane is used and a radial outward flow creates the perpendicular field. (c) In ThFFF a temperature gradient (ΔT) is formed between a hot wall and a cold wall, and sample migrates towards the cold wall because of thermal diffusion (DT).
Macromolecules are ubiquitous in many areas of science and technology. Depending on the macromolecule, it is important to analyze properties such as size, molar mass (MM), chemical composition, degree of branching, and their respective distributions to understand their behavior. However, because of the complex nature of polymers, current separation techniques are not always capable of comprehensive analyses. Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) is widely regarded as the workhorse for polymer characterization, but is limited by high molar mass (HMM) macromolecules, weakly bound complexes and aggregate species, and highly branched polymers. Field-flow fractionation (FFF) is a versatile family of techniques that complements SEC with additional separation capabilities based on analyte size, mass, composition, or architecture depending on the field used (Figure 1).

Figure 2: An IgG1 recombinant fully humanized monoclonal antibody was analyzed by FFF in two different carrier fluids: (a) 0.1% acetic acid containing 50 mM magnesium chloride and (b) 10 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.1. High molar mass aggregates (peak at ~18.5 min) present in (a) are absent in (b) as a result of weak aggregate interactions stabilized by the magnesium chloride. Adapted and reproduced with permission from reference 2.
The open-channel FFF design results in a soft separation mechanism that is well suited for analysis of high and ultrahigh MM polymers and samples containing microgel. Some key advantages of FFF over SEC arise from its ability to separate analytes over a broad size range (0.001–100 μm) using a single channel, and the absence of column packing, which greatly reduces shear degradation. SEC of protein aggregates often requires the addition of cosolvents or preconditioning of columns to reduce adsorption (1). However, addition of cosolvents may induce aggregation, dissociate aggregates, or cause sample specific adsorption (Figure 2) (2). Preconditioning columns is often practiced but not reported in the literature, and even when preconditioning is used poor recoveries and sample specific adsorption have been observed (3). In FFF the ability to use formulation buffer allows separations and measurements under solution conditions that are more representative of actual use. For polymer analysis, the shear degradation and coelution of small and large analytes observed in SEC for highly branched polymers are attributed to effects caused by the column packing material (4).

Figure 3: ThFFF–MALS–dRI analysis of unfiltered (solid line, black symbols) and 0.5-μm filtered (dashed line, grey symbols) microgel-containing poly(vinyl acetate). The lines and symbols represent the dRI fractograms and rg, respectively. Significant polymer loss in the filtered sample is evident in the lower MM distribution. Adapted and reproduced with permission from reference 5.
In practice, FFF offers users additional benefits. Before SEC, filtering is often implemented as a sample preparation step to remove large components and help prolong the life of the column. Sample filtering has been shown to remove soluble and insoluble microgels leading to erroneous MM and polydispersity results (Figure 3) (5). Filtering is not required in FFF and soluble polymers and microgels can be simultaneously characterized. Many syntheses require the addition of excess reagents, which may interfere with subsequent product analyses. Such reagents or interfering low MM sample components either are eluted in the void peak or can be removed on-line through a semipermeable membrane used in some FFF techniques.

Separations in FFF are dependent on the strength of an externally applied field that can be easily adjusted. Therefore, resolution and separation speed are readily controlled without the need to change channels. In addition, the open-channel design greatly reduces the chance of contamination and inexpensive membranes can be replaced when contaminated. Finally, FFF is easily coupled on-line with detectors frequently used for SEC analysis, including multiangle light scattering (MALS), differential refractive index (dRI), and mass spectrometry (MS) detectors. For those interested in FFF, building a simple homemade system requires an FFF channel and standard high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) components common to many laboratories. The recent advances in FFF over the last three years are highlighted in this review.


blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:



Column Watch: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments. LATEST: Avoiding Reversed-Phase Chromatography Problems Through Informed Method Development Practices: Choosing the Stationary-Phase Chemistry

Perspectives in Modern HPLC: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: Seven Common Faux Pas in Modern HPLC

MS — The Practical Art: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis

LC Troubleshooting: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: Estimating Resolution for Marginally Separated Peaks

More LCGC Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>

Source: LCGC North America,
Click here