Previous installments in this series covered the basics of valving and its applications in gas chromatography (GC). This month,
we will discuss the use of fluidic switching devices for open-tubular column manipulations, such as heartcutting and comprehensive
multidimensional GC×GC.
Open-tubular (capillary) gas chromatography (GC) columns challenge mechanical flow switching valves with requirements for
higher speeds and lower volumes. Soon after the initial development of capillary columns, researchers recognized that fluidic
flow switching devices were well suited for multidimensional capillary GC applications. David R. Deans (1) was one of the
pioneers who published papers and patents on the subject in the late 1960s; the term Deans switch is synonymous with such applications. But practical multidimensional capillary column implementations depend on precise pressure
settings and timing intervals, and the mechanical pressure regulators and control systems found in earlier gas chromatographs
were not up to the challenges of widespread application. Broader adoption of capillary column multidimensional applications
was delayed until the onset of modern solid-state electronics, microprocessor control, and the silicon microelectromechanical
systems (MEMS) devices that constitute the pressure and flow components of electronic pressure control systems (EPC) found
in modern GC instruments.
Fluidic Switching
Fluidic switching depends on a fundamental characteristic of fluid flow through an enclosed channel: A pressure differential
creates directional fluid flow through the channel in the direction of lower pressure. Reversing the pressure differential
reverses the direction of flow. The flow channel can be a passageway inside a switching device, or it can be an entire chromatographic
column. These obvious statements are no revelation to chromatographers, but keep them in mind as an aid in understanding what
follows. Rotary valves directly connect to sample loops, columns, and detectors for detector selection, column-to-column manipulations,
and backflushing, to name a few applications. Earlier installments in this series (2,3) described how chromatographers configure
rotary valves to redirect column output to different detectors or other columns. Implementations with rotary valves are robust
and generally simpler to set up and maintain than fluidic switches. However, mechanical actuators have limited switching speeds
and are subject to mechanical stress and wear over the long run. Valve rotors have temperature limits to be considered as
well. Diaphragm valves, which use pressure to actuate and relieve polymeric seals across the valve ports instead of a rotating
valve core, switch faster and have extended lifetimes. Mechanical valves are ideal for packed, micropacked, and some wider
bore capillary columns, and fluidic switches perform best with narrower capillaries and at higher switching speeds.
The Deans switch originally employed a series of interconnected tees and crosses with control flows driven by electrical solenoids.
Modern implementations use more integrated designs that incorporate the minimum number of external unions. Precisely formed
internal passageways are allocated to the necessary cross-connections; these also form internal restrictions where desired.
These designs have minimum dead volumes and their construction materials present highly inert surfaces to passing solutes.
The control pressures are established and modulated over time with electronic pressure control (EPC).
 Figure 1
|
Figure 1 illustrates how a fluidic switching scheme would work for a single incoming flow with two exits. This generic fluidic
switch diagram shows a narrow tube into which an incoming flow is directed. The incoming flow (orange line) is directed by
the control flows S1 and S2 (green lines) to either outlet 1 or outlet 2, depending on the relative pressures of the control
inputs. The two vertical dashed lines labeled T1 and T2 illustrate where the device would be divided if three discrete tee
fittings were used, such as in earlier implementations.
In Figure 1a, the control pressure applied at S1 is higher than that applied at S2. As a result, flow inside the device at
the input stream's central point of entrance runs from left to right, and the input stream is directed to outlet 2. When the
pressures at the control points are reversed, as in Figure 1b, then the flow proceeds from right to left, and the input stream
is directed to outlet 1.
The input stream, which is most often the carrier gas from a first column, is diluted with a small amount of control gas on
its way through the switching device. Careful choice of pressures relative to the columns and restrictions minimizes the amount
of dilution and normally does not create any problems with sensitivity or peak resolution — in fact, resolution is improved
as the result of better peak shapes. A minimum amount of flow at all times from both of the pressure control inputs prevents
back flow and flushes the inner passageways. In contrast, the mechanical switching valve arrangements discussed in earlier
installments (2,3) do not contribute any additional gases to the main carrier streams.
The associated columns and restrictors are not shown in this diagram. The inlet point and each outlet point of the fluidic
switch would connect in an application-dependent fashion to a column or restrictor, whose pressure and flow characteristics
determine the passage of carrier and control gases through the switching system in concert with the incoming pressure settings.