10 Ways to Break Your LC–MS System - - Chromatography Online
10 Ways to Break Your LC–MS System




If there’s one mantra that’s essential for an LC– or GC–MS system operator it’s “contamination, contamination, contamination”. Keep contamination to a minimum and you’ll enjoy a reliable instrument. If you don’t take the necessary precautions you’ll be reaching for the vent switch and purchasing lots of spares.

1) Not using a divert valve:

A divert valve allows you to switch portions of the mobile phase to waste before the mass spectrometer. This is particularly important for the portion containing all the unretained components – many of which are likely to be involatile and contaminate the source. If you really want to keep things clean use a divert valve to divert everything to waste except the compounds of interest.

2) Not using involatile buffer:

Some manufacturers have methods that claim to allow you to use phosphate and other involatile buffers with LC–MS instruments. Although this may be theoretically possible, try to avoid using phosphates and stick to the tried and tested volatile buffers we all know and love. Accumulation of involatile species not only blocks the sampling orifice — it also changes the voltages that are required by each electrostatic element of the source for optimum (or any!) ion generation.

3) Using too high a flow rate:

Although many modern instruments allow you to use higher high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) flow rates with electrospray, it’s still a good idea to use the traditionally optimal flow rate of 0.2-0.3 mL/min. Higher flow rates mean more mobile phase and, therefore, more contamination entering the source. Either use a post-column splitter or a narrower i.d. (ideally 2.1 mm) column, which allows higher mobile phase linear velocity (cm/sec) but limits the volumetric flow (mL/min.)

4) Too high a sample concentration:

We’ve all done it — loaded a high concentration onto the column to bring up the sensitivity of smaller components. This also does a really good job of contaminating the source very quickly. If possible use a divert valve to divert all the concentrated material to waste. If you absolutely have to have the concentrated analyte going into the source (for example, for checking for peak purity) try to limit the amount of injections you make.

5) Venting too frequently:

Mass spectrometers are at their most reliable when they are left running. Venting the instrument increases wear and risks damage to many components. An expensive component particularly prone to damage through venting is the turbo pump which is designed to operate at high vacuum. When switching on the vacuum for the first time there is a rush of atmospheric air which places a high amount of strain on the turbo vanes and particularly the bearings. This greatly accelerates the wear on the turbo.

6) Not checking your rotary pump oil:

It’s big, it’s heavy, and it feels as solid as a tank. It can be easy to dismiss the rotary pump as being tough enough to not require any TLC from the user. These pumps consume small amounts of oil (lost as ‘mist’) in normal use and need regular topping up. In addition, a lot of the solvents and materials going through the MS end up dissolved in the rotary pump oil which degrade it and cause increased wear on the rotary pump components. The oil needs to be drained and changed at the recommended interval. For more frequent oil maintenance — some rotary (foreline) pumps allow the user to "ballast" the pump to remove more volatile contaminants. This is usually simply achieved using a valve on the pump and should be carried out weekly in order to maintain the quality of the vacuum within the MS – and therefore the sensitivity of your instrument!

The complete article is available to CHROMacademy Lite and Premier members here >>

CHROMacademy Lite Membership is FREE and it only takes two minutes to register.

With a Lite Membership you are given access to:
∙ This month's webcast & tutorial
∙ Selected eLearning modules
∙ Featured CHROMacademy Content
∙ The CHROMacademy forum

Test drive CHROMacademy and Check out more great content available FREE to our Lite members »

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:




 

LCGC COLUMNISTS 2014

Sample Prep Perspectives | Ronald E. Majors: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments.
LATEST: UV Detector Problems


Perspectives in Modern HPLC | Michael W. Dong: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: Superficially Porous Particles: Perspectives, Practices, and Trends


MS — The Practical Art | Kate Yu: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis


LC Troubleshooting | John Dolan: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: Problems with Large-Molecule Separations


More LCGC Chromatography-Related Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>



Click here