Avoiding Refractive Index Detector Problems - - Chromatography Online
Avoiding Refractive Index Detector Problems


LCGC North America
Volume 30, Issue 12, pp. 1032-1037

The refractive index (RI) detector is unique among common liquid chromatography (LC) detectors because it is truly universal in its detection capabilities. LC detectors based on the absorbance of ultraviolet (UV) light are the most popular detectors because they are simple, reliable, sensitive, and respond to a wide range of sample compounds, but only if the analytes have sufficient UV absorbance to detect. Fluorescence detectors are much more selective and can be more sensitive, but compounds must fluoresce to be detected. Mass spectrometry (MS) detectors are increasing in popularity and can provide extremely sensitive and selective detection, but only if the sample can be ionized. RI detectors respond to a universal, bulk property of the analyte — its refractive index. Usually referred to as differential refractive index detectors, these detectors detect peaks based on the difference in refractive index between the analyte and the background mobile phase. This is a benefit that makes the detector universal, but also a problem in that the detector also is sensitive to any other factor that affects refractive index. The major factors are temperature, pressure, and mobile-phase composition. This month's installment describes how RI detectors work and discusses some good practices to follow to get the most out of this powerful detector.

How It Works


Figure 1: Schematic of a generic refractive index detector, showing the key components.
Let's first consider how the RI detector works. There are specific design differences between detectors from different manufacturers, but most have the elements of the generic detector shown in Figure 1 in common. All RI detectors depend on the fundamental property of light's refraction, or change of angle, as it passes through different materials. In the case of the RI detector, light passes through the clear walls of the flow cell and through the fluid in the cell. With each transition, refraction takes place and the direction of the light changes slightly. Rather than detect the absolute refractive index (which some detectors can), most detectors measure the differential refraction between a sample flow cell and a static reference cell filled with mobile phase. This, in effect, subtracts the mobile-phase background signal from the sample signal. Because light of longer wavelengths refracts more than shorter wavelengths, a tungsten lamp or light-emitting diode (LED) is used as the light source in most RI detectors. In a quick survey I did of commercial RI detectors, various manufacturers used light sources producing wavelengths of 660–880 nm. After the light has passed through the sample and reference cells, it must be detected. Most commonly this is done with a pair of photodiodes. As the refractive index changes, the position of the light beam on the photodiodes shifts so that more or less light shines on each diode. This shift of position can then be detected by comparing the relative intensity of the signal produced by the two photodiodes. In Figure 1, you can see that most of the light strikes the upper diode. With a change in refractive index, the position of the light beam might move down, causing less light to strike the upper diode and more on the lower one.

The basic components of the RI detector shown in Figure 1 are supplemented in real detectors by hardware to stabilize the detector and simplify operation. The reference cell needs to be filled with mobile phase of the same composition as that filling the sample cell (without the analyte, of course). To facilitate this, a switching valve commonly is included to direct mobile phase through the reference cell to refresh or replace the resident liquid. Because it can take several hours for the detector to stabilize, the switching valve may be capable of routing the waste line back into the mobile-phase reservoir to allow the mobile phase to be recycled during warm-up so as to reduce the waste of mobile phase.

A change in environmental temperature can be a major problem with RI detectors, because the refractive index of a fluid is dependent on its temperature. For this reason, RI detectors are contained in an insulated compartment. Most commercial detectors can control the temperature above room temperature, typically 30–35 C up to 50–60 C, although some models can cool the detector as well. Also, the incoming mobile phase must be at the same temperature as the thermostated portion of the detector, so heat exchangers are included to stabilize the temperature of the mobile phase. Although flow-cell volumes are relatively small, typically 8–10 μL, the heat exchanger volume may be 5–10 times this, or even more. This added volume means that RI detectors usually generate broader peaks than their UV counterparts with smaller total detector volumes.

The inherent design and operating principles of RI detectors leave them susceptible to several problem areas. Specifically, anything that causes changes in the temperature, pressure, or mobile-phase composition will create corresponding changes in the refractive index of the mobile phase as it passes through the sample cell. If this is not compensated by the static mobile phase in the reference cell, baseline disturbances will occur. We'll look at each of these problem areas next.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:




 

LCGC COLUMNISTS 2014

Column Watch | Ronald E. Majors: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments. LATEST: Standardized Testing of Silica as a Base Material for Difficult Bonded-Phase Preparative Applications


Perspectives in Modern HPLC: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: Seven Common Faux Pas in Modern HPLC


MS — The Practical Art: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis


LC Troubleshooting: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: How Much Retention Time Variation Is Normal?


More LCGC Chromatography-Related Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>


Source: LCGC North America,
Click here