Mixed-Mode HPLC Separations: What, Why, and How - - Chromatography Online
Mixed-Mode HPLC Separations: What, Why, and How

LCGC Europe
Volume 27, Issue 1, pp. 170

An excerpt from LCGC's e-learning tutorial on mixed-mode separations at http://CHROMacademy.com/

Although reversed-phase columns (such as C18) are used in a wide range of applications, they often fail to retain highly polar (or charged) analytes, and offer limited selectivity.

Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) is often used to analyze polar analytes, but encounters challenges such as increased use of organic solvents, poor solubility of analytes in highly organic media, retention effects created by the sample matrix, and a limitation to the extent to which the retention of hydrophobic analytes can be controlled. Ion-exchange chromatography can be used to retain charged molecules, but it fails to retain neutral analytes and can show poor selectivity for analytes of the same charge. A current estimate of the usage of these two techniques is reversed phase ~60+%; HILIC or normal phase ~18%; ion exchange ~5%.

The use of mixed-mode stationary phases can offer a solution to some of the problems outlined above and their properties and applications can be summarized as follows:
  • Mixed-mode chromatography is a method that utilizes more than one separation mode; mainly reversed-phase combined with ion-exchange interactions, which allows the retention and separation of both polar and nonpolar analytes in a single analysis.
  • The biggest benefit of this approach is that selectivity can be optimized by adjusting mobile-phase ionic strength, pH, or organic solvent. As a result, the selectivity can be finely tuned for the separation of compounds with widely different physico-chemical properties. For example, drug molecules and their counterions may be separated in a single analysis.
  • Mixed-mode chromatography requires no ion-pairing agents in the mobile phase for separating highly hydrophilic charged analytes, which simplifies the mobile phase and is compatible with mass spectrometry (MS).

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the various approaches to producing mixed-mode stationary phases.
A general schematic for the various approaches to producing mixed-mode stationary phases is shown in Figure 1.

The mixed beads approach in Figure 1 is a blend of two different stationary phases into a single column: Reversed phase (in black) and ion exchange (in red). This approach creates concerns regarding the batch-to-batch reproducibility and homogeneity of the resulting high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) columns.

The mixed ligand approach to mixed-mode stationary phase production was a second-generation product, but again, ensuring the absolutely reproducibility and homogeneity of the surface is problematic.

Embedded and tipped ligands are a third-generation approach to mixed-mode phases and produce homogeneous and reproducible mixed-mode phases. The position of the ion-exchange group within the bonded phase ligand dictates the relative strength of the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions and the embedded ligand can be described as an ion-exchange–modified reversed-phase column and the tipped ligand as a reversed-phase–modified ion-exchange column.

The zwitterionic ligand is a fourth-generation approach to mixed-mode separations in which both anionic and cationic functional groups are included in each ligand and the strength and position of the ion-exchange moieties can be altered to affect the selectivity of each ligand towards various analytes.

In mixed-mode separations, the hydrophobic moieties of analyte molecules are retained by interaction with the hydrophobic parts of the bonded ligand, and the charged groups are either retained or repelled by the ion-exchange groups on the stationary phase surface. There are several ways to control retention and selectivity with mixed-mode phases, as one might imagine.

The amount of organic modifier can be altered to affect changes in retention and selectivity of the separation, primarily by changing the hydrophobicity of the eluent, as would be typical for a reversed-phase separation.

Eluent pH can also be used to alter selectivity and retention, and the pH will affect not only the degree of ionization of the analyte molecule, but also the extent of the surface charge if weak anion- or cation-exchange ligands are used. The ionic strength of the eluent can be used to alter the separation characteristics, and ionic-strength gradients are often used to increase the elution strength of the eluent with respect to the electrostatic interactions between analytes and the stationary phase surface.

The nature of mixed mode stationary phases offer several possibilities to "tune" the selectivity of a separation and as such offer an important tool in the analytical armoury for anyone dealing with highly polar analytes or analytes whose physicochemical properties differ widely.


blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:



Column Watch: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments. LATEST: When Bad Things Happen to Good Food: Applications of HPLC to Detect Food Adulteration

Perspectives in Modern HPLC: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: HPLC for Characterization and Quality Control of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

MS — The Practical Art: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis

LC Troubleshooting: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: How Much Can I Inject? Part I: Injecting in Mobile Phase

More LCGC Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>

Source: LCGC Europe,
Click here