Forensic fingerprinting - - Chromatography Online
Forensic fingerprinting

The Column
Volume 8, Issue 20

Fingerprint analysis has been a standard method for forensic analysis and is used to identify suspects at the scene of a crime. Recent advances in next‑generation DNA sequencing technology have revolutionized the criminal justice system and has downgraded the importance of fingerprint analysis. It was previously considered that DNA evidence indicated the presence of an assailant at the scene of a crime, but this is no longer the case. The positioning of DNA material can be circumstantial in some cases and this is where recent advances in analytical chemistry instrumentation can enhance the power of fingerprint analysis.

A fingerprint is defined as an invisible impression composed of ridges and grooves left by an individual on a surface. Fingerprints are often incomplete and cannot be used for the automated identification protocols used in forensic investigations.1 However, human skin secretes a unique chemical signature that is thought to be influenced by environmental factors such as diet, chemical exposure and individual genetics.

A group of researchers1 published a study which exploited the unique properties of individual fingerprints to create a more detailed profiling method. Rather than simply observing the ridged patterns associated with unique exposure of the individual’s hands to their environment, the scientists analysed the chemical signature as a new parameter for analysis. The study aimed to identify fatty acids associated with specific fingerprints using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The group found that there were differences in the chemical signature associated with fingerprints when comparing individuals of different race and gender, specifically variation in the ratio of several fatty acid and methyl esters. There was additional evidence to suggest that other compounds mirrored this variability, however, further investigation is required to confirm this hypothesis. As a greater number of individuals are sampled and additional controls are implemented, it will become clearer if this will method will become commercialized.

1. S. Michalski et al, Forensic Sci, DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12010 (2012).

This story originally appeared in The Column. Click here to view that issue.


blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:



Column Watch: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments. LATEST: When Bad Things Happen to Good Food: Applications of HPLC to Detect Food Adulteration

Perspectives in Modern HPLC: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: HPLC for Characterization and Quality Control of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

MS — The Practical Art: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis

LC Troubleshooting: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: How Much Can I Inject? Part I: Injecting in Mobile Phase

More LCGC Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>

Source: The Column,
Click here