Ultra-Fast Analysis of Alkaloids and Permitted Additives in Dark Chocolate Products - - Chromatography Online
Ultra-Fast Analysis of Alkaloids and Permitted Additives in Dark Chocolate Products


The Column
Volume 10, Issue 11, pp. 17-20

A simple, rapid, and robust ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method for the simultaneous determination of polyphenols, methylxanthines, sweeteners, and flavouring substances as well as some common preservatives has been developed using an automated method scouting and method optimization workflow. The most suitable mobile phase and stationary phase combination was identified in an overnight scouting run. These conditions were used to create a two-dimensional model using computer simulation software. Temperature and gradient time were varied to establish the best separation conditions. This approach resulted in a 1.5 min gradient method that could screen 17 compounds of interest.


PHOTO CREDIT: MALERAPASO/GETTY IMAGES
Chocolate is one of the most popular indulgences available. As well as the well-known negative effects of any high-fat, high-sugar food product, there is also evidence of health benefits related to chocolate consumption. These positive effects, such as lowered blood pressure, antioxidant properties, reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disorders, and an increase in cognitive abilities, are all attributed to the flavonoid content, which is only relevant in dark chocolate products (≥ 40% cocoa) (Flavonoids can also be found in milk chocolate but in a very low concentration).

However, a high cocoa and a high flavonoid content comes with an even higher amount of less desirable alkaloids, namely the stimulants caffeine and theobromine. In addition to the natural products found in cocoa beans, a large number of permitted additives can be added to chocolate products to alter the taste, texture, or expiry date, such as artificial or natural sweeteners, and flavouring compounds or preservatives. To monitor the composition and therefore the quality of cocoa in the food product, an analytical method needs to enable individual quantification of any of these potential ingredients.

This article describes the development and optimization of a rapid ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) screening test for the separation and quantification of polyphenols, methylxanthines, sweeteners, and flavouring substances as well as some common preservatives for the quality control of dark chocolate products.

Experimental

Equipment and Chromatographic Methods: For UHPLC method scouting, a Shimadzu Nexera X2 Method Scouting System was used, consisting of two quaternary solvent pumps, autosampler, and column oven, including a six-column switching valve. The system was also equipped with a high resolution UV photo diode array (PDA) detector and an LCMS-8040 triple quadrupole mass spectrogmeter via an electrospray ionization (ESI) source.

Method scouting was performed in an overnight sequence using 5 min gradient runs at 40 C. Five combinations of stationary phase and mobile phase were selected. The columns comprised a variety of bonded phases that exploit multiple mechanisms of separation and therefore provide alternative selectivity to common C18 phases. The aqueous and organic mobile phase combinations contained the same buffer salt/acid (AA/BA; AB/BB; and AC/BC).


Figure 1: Colour-coded resolution map for UHPLC method development.
After method scouting a column with a polar embedded group for enhanced polar selectivity was found to offer the best separation from the columns selected with all analytes of interest at least partly separated using a mobile phase consisting of A: 10 mM ammonium formate in H2O (pH 2.8) and B: 10 mM ammonium formate (pH 2.8) in MeCN/H2O (90:10 v/v). These conditions were used to create a two-dimensional DryLab model (Molnr Institute) using 2 min and 6 min gradient runs at 25 C and 50 C as input data. These experiments resulted in a colour-coded resolution map for simple identification of the optimum separation conditions (Figure 1).

The software predicted an optimum separation with a minimum resolution of the critical peak pair of 1.6 in a gradient run from 5% to 85% B in 1.5 min at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min at 42 C.


Figure 2: Comparison of the predicted and actual chromatogram of the UHPLC analysis of alkaloids and permitted additives in dark chocolate products.
To obtain the best possible resolution the column was packed with 2-m particles instead of the 3-m particle size tested initially. The selectivity of the column was identical and the pressure increase was not higher than predicted by the software so the change in particle size did not cause any problem for the separation. A comparison of the predicted chromatogram with an actual sample run is displayed in Figure 2.

Sample Preparation: The chocolate sample was defatted and the compounds extracted into a sample solvent suitable for high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.


Figure 3: UHPLC analysis of the extracted chocolate sample in a 1.5 min gradient with PDA detection. Column: ACE Excel 2 C18-Amide, 100 2.1 mm, mobile phase: 10 mM HCOONH4, pH 2.8 in A: H2O and B: MeCN/H2O (90:10 v/v), 1.2 mL/min flow, 42 C.
A 2 g sample of dark chocolate (≥ 63% cocoa) was spiked with approximately 100 g of standard substances before being defatted twice with 15 mL of n-hexane for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath at 30 C. The mixture was then centrifuged for 10 min at 6000 rpm. The supernatant with the dissolved fat was discarded and the precipitate was air-dried and reconstituted in a mixture of acetone, water, and acetic acid (70:29.8:0.2 v/v/v) and sonicated for another 15 min at 30 C. The sample was then filtered and heated to 40 C to evaporate the organic solvent. The remaining aqueous fraction was filtered again and used for UHPLC analysis.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:




 

LCGC COLUMNISTS 2014

Column Watch: Ron Majors, established authority on new column technologies, keeps readers up-to-date with new sample preparation trends in all branches of chromatography and reviews developments. LATEST: Avoiding Reversed-Phase Chromatography Problems Through Informed Method Development Practices: Choosing the Stationary-Phase Chemistry


Perspectives in Modern HPLC: Michael W. Dong is a senior scientist in Small Molecule Drug Discovery at Genentech in South San Francisco, California. He is responsible for new technologies, automation, and supporting late-stage research projects in small molecule analytical chemistry and QC of small molecule pharmaceutical sciences. LATEST: Seven Common Faux Pas in Modern HPLC


MS — The Practical Art: Kate Yu brings her expertise in the field of mass spectrometry and hyphenated techniques to the pages of LCGC. In this column she examines the mass spectrometric side of coupled liquid and gas-phase systems. Troubleshooting-style articles provide readers with invaluable advice for getting the most from their mass spectrometers. LATEST: Radical Mass Spectrometry as a New Frontier for Bioanalysis


LC Troubleshooting: LC Troubleshooting sets about making HPLC methods easier to master. By covering the basics of liquid chromatography separations and instrumentation, John Dolan is able to highlight common problems and provide remedies for them. LATEST: Estimating Resolution for Marginally Separated Peaks


More LCGC Columnists>>

LCGC North America Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Europe Editorial Advisory Board>>

LCGC Editorial Team Contacts>>


Source: The Column,
Click here