LC–MS-Compatible Separation of Polar Compounds Using Silica Hydride Columns - - Chromatography Online
LC–MS-Compatible Separation of Polar Compounds Using Silica Hydride Columns


LCGC North America
Volume 31, Issue 2, pp. 144-157

Conclusions


Table IV: Parameters investigated for robustness
The presented data illustrate how an LC–MS-compatible separation of four hydrophilic test solutes in 12 min can be accomplished using ANP chromatography. Using a quick six-step process, the final method was devised that produced both good separation and symmetrical peak shapes. Before each step, predictions and expectations were made on how the analytes would interact under the method conditions studied based on the appropriate retention model. After each step, the results were scrutinized in terms of their agreement with the model and the predictions made from it. Further predictions using a better understanding of the retention mechanism could then be used to refine the method. The differences observed in the data are consistent with what is known about ANP retention and how the ionization state of both the analytes and the stationary phase can affect it. Keeping these factors in mind for prediction of chromatographic behavior leads to a much more streamlined method development process.

References

(1) J.J. Pesek and M.T. Matyska, J. Sep. Sci. 28, 1845–1854 (2005).

(2) T. Ikegami, K. Tomomatsu, H. Takubo, K. Horie, and N. Tanaka, J. Chromatogr. A 1184, 474–503 (2008).

(3) L.F. Russel, in Handbook of Food Analysis: Physical Characterization and Nutrient Analysis (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2004), pp. 487–572.

(4) T. Cecchi in Ion-Pair Chromatography and Related Techniques, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2009) pp. 79–90.

(5) D.E. Breithaupt, Food Chem. 74, 521–525 (2001).

(6) T. Grindberg and K. Williams, Concordia College Journal of Analytical Chemistry 1, 19–23 (2010).

(7) N. Parris in Instrumental Liquid Chromatography, 2nd Ed., (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984) p. 15.

(8) R. Cunico, K. Gooding, and T. Wehr, in Basic HPLC and CE of Biomolecules (Bay Bioanalytical Laboratory, Inc. Richmond, California, 1998), p. 148.

(9) Z. Chen, B. Chen, and S. Yao, Anal. Chim. Acta 569, 173 (2006).

Joshua E. Young and Maria T. Matyska are with MicroSolv Technology Corporation in South New Berlin, New York. Hong Nhung Nguyen and Joseph J. Pesek are with the Department of Chemistry at San José State University in San José, California. Direct correspondence to:
.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus
LCGC E-mail Newsletters
Global E-newsletters subscribe here:




 
Survey
How easy is it to implement a QbD approach to analytical method development?
How easy is it to implement a QbD approach to analytical method development?
Very easy
Fairly easy
Not easy
Very easy
10%
Fairly easy
45%
Not easy
45%
View Results
Source: LCGC North America,
Click here