The global economic downturn, particularly the collapse of the automotive and associated industries, has caused an overall reduction in the demand for acrylonitrile. Since acetonitrile is obtained as a co-product in the production of acrylonitrile, the pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and chemical industries are experiencing an unprecedented acetonitrile shortage. This shortage has resulted in a sharp price increase, in some cases as much as 6-8 times; and the price is projected to remain high even after the production returns to normal.
The global economic downturn, particularly the collapse of the automotive and associated industries, has caused an overall reduction in the demand for acrylonitrile. Since acetonitrile is obtained as a co-product in the production of acrylonitrile, the pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and chemical industries are experiencing an unprecedented acetonitrile shortage. This shortage has resulted in a sharp price increase, in some cases as much as 6-8 times; and the price is projected to remain high even after the production returns to normal.
Acetonitrile is among the most commonly used organic solvents in reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), mainly due to its miscibility with water, acceptable UV absorptivity, and reasonable viscosity. The ongoing acetonitrile shortage has forced chemists to either reduce their solvent usage by using shorter, narrower columns packed with small particles; or replace acetonitrile with more readily available solvent such as methanol. One has to realize, though, that since acetonitrile and methanol are situated at vastly different segments of the solvent/selectivity triangle (1), transfer from an acetonitrile based method to a methanol based one is hardly straightforward.
To this end, supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) certainly holds great potential in becoming an attractive alternative to acetonitrile-reliant RPLC. In SFC, supercritical CO2 in combination with one or more polar organic solvents, predominantly alcohols, is used as the mobile phase. Due to the lower viscosity and higher diffusivity of supercritical fluids, SFC is a fast separation technique of inherently high chromatographic efficiency, comparable to ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) in both speed and efficiency. Furthermore, SFC has been demonstrated to cover as wide a range of compounds in both functionality and polarity as RPLC, but also compliment RPLC in selectivity, particularly for extremely polar and non-polar analytes owing to its normal phase separation mechanism. For example, Pinkston et al. (2) published their study comparing SFC-MS with LC-MS in analyzing a total of 2266 diverse, pharmaceutical relevant compounds. They concluded that SFC-MS is suitable for screening large and diverse libraries of molecules. The percentages of eluted and correctly identified compounds from both methods were statistically equivalent. Coincidently, acetonitrile/water was used as the mobile phase in the LC-MS analyses.
In this brief note, we report our effort in developing an acetonitrile-free SFC based chromatographic methodology for fast detection and quantitation of melamine in infant formula. Melamine is a nitrogen-rich heterocyclic compound. When adulterated in protein based food products, it can falsely boost apparent protein content based on the Kjedahl method where nitrogen is used to assess the protein content. In March 2007, imported pet food ingredients contaminated with melamine caused kidney and renal failure in dogs and cats across the United States. In 2008, infant deaths were reported in China, believed to be associated with the ingestion of infant formula contaminated by melamine. In response to the public outcry for rapid and accurate melamine detection and quantitation in food safety testing, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and instrument manufactures have proposed analytical approaches based on gas chromatography (GC), reverse phase ion-pairing LC (both traditional and ultra-performance or rapid resolution), and ion exchange LC. It is noted, however, that acetonitrile was employed in all LC based approaches. With the acetonitrile shortage looming large, we want to demonstrate the applicability of SFC in melamine detection and quantitation; but more importantly, use this application as an example to stimulate more acetonitrile-free SFC applications in lieu of acetonitrile based LC ones.
Melamine standard was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. LC grade methanol was purchased from EMD. Infant formula was purchased from a local supermarket. A Thar Method Station II analytical SFC (Thar Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA) equipped with a Gilson UV detector and a 2-ethyl pyridine column (4.6×150 mm, 6 μ, Princeton Chromatography, Princeton, NJ) were used in this study. For all experiments, CO2 (mobile phase A) and methanol (mobile phase B) were used as the mobile phase, the flow rate was 3 ml/min, column temperature was 40 °C, UV wavelength was 210 nm, and injection volume was 10 μl. A generic gradient of 5–50 B% over 5 min was used. It is noted that sample clean-up and extraction is an integral part of melamine detection and quantitation, but beyond the scope of this brief application note. An FDA developed sample preparation protocol to monitor melamine in powdered milk products (3) was therefore adopted with minor modifications. In brief, the protocol involved dissolution, protein precipitation, and sample filtration.
Figure 1a shows the SFC chromatogram of melamine neat solution. Melamine elutes at 3.28 min, in the middle of the gradient, indicating a reasonable retention on the pyridine column. It has to be pointed out that analysis time can be further reduced by using a higher flow rate. The low viscosity of supercritical fluids offers a unique advantage for SFC. In SFC, a much higher flow rate (as much as 8 times LC) can be used for the columns of the same dimension without experiencing a formidable back pressure elevation. Figure 1b is the chromatogram of an infant formula sample spiked with melamine after undergoing the sample preparation process. It can be clearly seen that virtually all the inherent sample matrices are well resolved from melamine, providing a good foundation for ensuing quantitative work.
Figure 1: SFC chromatogram of melamine: (a) neat solution; and (b) spiked formula with melamine.
A set of serial dilutions of melamine neat solution was performed to construct a calibration curve ranging from 15 to 200 ppm. The results are summarized in Figure 2. Based on the calibration curve, the calculated melamine concentration in the spiked formula (Figure 1b) was 73 ppm, well agreeing with the actual concentration of 71 ppm. Five formula samples spiked with known concentrations of melamine were also analyzed (results not shown) and the recoveries range from 73 to 103%, similar to what was achieved using the same protocol followed by LC analyses (70–115%), both conforming to the FDA guidelines.
Figure 2: Standard calibration curve for melamine ranging from 15 to 200 ppm.
The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) of this methodology are estimated to be 1 ppm and 15 ppm, respectively. The chromatogram at the LOD is shown in Figure 3. These are similar to what can be achieved using LC UV. Significant improvement in LOD and LOQ are expected with mass spectrometric (MS) detectors. SFC MS has become a routine analytical tool in many pharmaceutical and chemical laboratories, and SFC MS-MS is currently being evaluated by both users and manufacturers.
Figure 3: SFC chromatogram of melamine at 1 ppm.
In this preliminary study, it is demonstrated that SFC UV can be used for rapid and accurate melamine determination in infant formula. The linearity of quantitation, LOD, and LOQ are on par with published LC UV assays following a similar sample preparation protocol. The analysis time for SFC is shorter than traditional LC. The mobile phase used in this SFC methodology is a mixture of readily available CO2 and methanol; and this should be welcome by many laboratories affected by the current acetonitrile shortage.
(1) L. R. Snyder, J. J. Kirkland, J. L. Glajch ed. Practical HPLC method development, 2nd ed., pp34–39, John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
(2) J. D. Pinkston, D. Wen, K. L. Morand, D. A. Tirey, D. Stanton, "Comparison of LC/MS and SFC/MS for Screening of a Large and Diverse Library of Pharmaceutically Relevant Compounds," Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 7467–7472.
(3) S. Turnspseed et al. "Determination of melamine and cyanuric acid residues in infant formula using LC MS/MS," LIB No 4221, volume 2, October 2008.n0
TharSFC, a Waters Company
575 Epsilon Drive, Suite 100, Pittsburgh, PA 15238
tel. (412)967-5665, fax (412)967-9446
Email: info@tharsfc.com Website: www.waters.com/sfc
Simplifying the GC Laboratory for Improved Efficiency
December 9th 2024Laboratories continually work to increase the capacity of their equipment, improve turnaround times and gain confident and detailed insights without generating additional burden on their operators. Discover how adopting the simplification strategy of Industry 4.0 with the GC 2400™ Platform can enhance GC workflows to increase efficiency, data quality, and business sustainability
How to Enable Sustainable GC Lab Operations
December 9th 2024Sustainability strategies are being integrated into a growing number of businesses and their operations. Laboratories are no exception. Although the necessity to reduce the environmental impact of laboratory operations is recognized, it cannot be disengaged from the economic viability of labs. This article shares ways in which laboratories can improve both their business and environmental sustainability and discusses how the GC 2400™ Platform is helping laboratories flourish in these areas
What Are the Key Features of a Smart and Connected GC Lab?
December 9th 2024The potential of smart technologies has evolved into a operational necessity - businesses were faced with the need for remote and automated operations bringing substantial improvements in productivity, efficiency, and operating costs.
Automated PFAS Extraction from Difficult Food and Food Packaging Samples
December 6th 2024More and more regulations regarding PFAS are being implemented with action limits that continue to decrease. Having a harmonized method to accurately determine the PFAS content in food, as well as other matrices, is important to ensuring long-term detection and regulation. The solvent extraction of PFAS from these varied sample matrices can be challenging given the susceptibility to contamination and the low levels in which these compounds are present. This poster, presented at RAFA 2024, examines the PFAS extraction several different food samples as well as food packing matrices.
Extraction of 40 PFAS Compounds from Soil and Tissue
December 6th 2024PFAS have been shown to cause health issues in humans, which means monitoring environmental solid samples, such as soil and tissue, is critical. This application note details the extraction of 40 spiked PFAS compounds from soil and tissue following EPA Method 1633. The automated extraction was less than 10 minutes per sample and yielded acceptable recoveries and RSDs without carryover in the system. The EDGE PFAS is an ideal option for laboratories that want to automate their PFAS extractions of solid samples.