Gas Chromatography (GC)

Latest News


Latest Videos


Shorts

Future Trends in the Laboratory
0:45
Future Trends in the Laboratory
a month ago
by
Kate Jones
3 Biggest Advances in GC and GC-MS
0:34
3 Biggest Advances in GC and GC-MS
2 months ago
by
Caroline Hroncich

More News

With the increasing interest in green chemistry and sustainability, analytical chemists are developing new methods and reexamining existing methods with a new emphasis on sustainability and environmental impact. Since the publication of the principles of green chemistry in the 1990s and the principles of green analytical chemistry in the 2000s, several scoring systems for evaluating the greenness or sustainability of analytical methods have been developed. In this column, we will examine three widely used scoring methods: Red, green blue (RGB), the analytical greenness metric (AGREE), and the analytical method greenness score (AMGS) with comments on how they all apply to gas chromatography (GC). We will see that classical GC, which has roots in the origins of the environmental movement, has been and remains among the greenest of analytical techniques.

Trap focusing offers a powerful solution to common challenges in headspace (HS) and solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography (SPME–GC) analysis of foodstuffs, including poor peak shape, limited sensitivity, and restricted dynamic range. This article explores how automated cryogen-free focusing, combined with multi-step enrichment and re-collection capabilities, can improve the detection and quantitation of both aroma-active compounds and trace-level contaminants. Using real-world examples, including flavor profiling of cola and garlic, and quantitation of ethylene oxide and epichlorohydrin in spices, enhanced chromatographic performance, greater confidence in compound identification, and lower detection limits than traditional workflows such as direct SPME or QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) are demonstrated.

Gas chromatography (GC) liners are offered in dozens of different configurations and internal diameters. The liner is designed with baffles or glass wool to best vaporize and mix the sample prior to transferring it to the head of the analytical column. Split liners have considerably more flow and are designed to handle high split ratios. For example, some liners have a glass dimple at the bottom to allow for higher flow rates (low pressure drop). Some split liners have an outer diameter of 6.3 mm while splitless liners have an outer diameter of 6.5 mm. It has been reported that these liners have been used interchangeably, which begs the question: Does the outer diameter matter?