The automated derivatization of fatty acids (FAs) was performed with the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench. Since free fatty acids show tailing in gas chromatography, transformation of fatty acids into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) is widely used.
The automated derivatization of fatty acids (FAs) was performed with the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench. Since free fatty acids show tailing in gas chromatography, transformation of fatty acids into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) is widely used. Manual sample derivatization is time-consuming and may lead to poor repeatibility. Automated derivatization shows significant enhancement of reproducibility and saves time. Especially for highly unsaturated fatty acids, slight variations in reaction temperature and time can negatively affect repeatability when using manual procedures.
Salmon oil is an excellent source of polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids. The two main fatty acids—eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)—have been identified as important health factors and are correlated with a normal function of the heart. The concentration of EPA and DHA is the crucial quality factor for salmon oil capsules. This application note demonstrates the use of the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench for derivatization and subsequent determination of both EPA and DHA from salmon oil capsules.
For sample preparation, 10 mg of salmon oil was weighed into a 2-mL autosampler vial. The sample was diluted in 500 µL of tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), using the liquid-dispensing module of the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench and mixed for 90 seconds with the onboard vortex mixer. A 250-µL aliquot of the prepared sample was transferred to an empty vial and 125 µL of a Trimethylsulfoniumhydroxide (TMSH) derivatization solution [MachereyNagel, Düren] was added and the mixture was again mixed using the vortex mixer of the WorkBench. The mixture was heated for 5 minutes at 80 °C in the single vial heater. The flow diagram for the automated procedure on the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench is in shown in Figure 1.
The gas chromatographic conditions were chosen as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. GC/FID Conditions
Figure 2 shows the separation of FAMEs from salmon oil on an Agilent 7696A WorkBench. The separation allows the unequivocal identification of all FAMEs. The two compounds of main interest show retention times of 35.07 minutes (EPA) and 40.55 minutes (DHA). Besides EPA (23.7%) and DHA (20.0%), salmon oil further consists of unsaturated fatty acids oleic (12%), linoic (11 %) and palmitoleic (8%) acid. The content of saturated fatty acids, palmitic and stearic acid, is low, 4% and 5%, respectively.
Figure 2. GC/FID chromatogram of a salmon oil sample, prepared using Agilent WorkBench 7696A
For the repeatability test, 10 individual salmon oil samples were derivatized and analyzed to determinate the reproducibility of the automatic sample preparation and chromatography. As shown in Figure 3, excellent repeatability was obtained. The absolute areas of the EPA and DHA signals showed standard deviations of less than 1% (EPA 0.51%, DHA 0.78%). Moreover, variations of the EPA and DHA relative concentrations were stable. Relative standard deviations of 0.85% for EPA and 1.22% for DHA were achieved. No outliers were observed over the 10 samples.
Figure 3. Repeatability data of of automated FAME determination in salmon oil
The total runtime for sample preparation on the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench was only 20 minutes per sample, whereas the time for the manual derivatization depends on the skills of the laboratory technician and can take up to 2 hours.
Figure 4. Structure of EPA methyl ester (left) and DHA methyl ester (right)
The automated sample derivatization is easy, fast, and reliable. For samples with high relative concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids especially, the automation is significantly more reliable than manual procedures.
Table 2. Percent distribution of fatty acids in salmon oil sample
(1) Animal and vegetable fats and oils - Gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters - Part 3: Preparation of methyl esters using trimethylsulfonium hydroxide (TMSH) (ISO 12966-3:2009)
Agilent shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. Information, descriptions, and specifications in this publication are subject to change without notice.
Inside the Laboratory: The Gionfriddo Group at the University at Buffalo
March 28th 2024In this edition of “Inside the Laboratory,” Emanuela Gionfriddo, PhD, an associate professor of chemistry at the University at Buffalo, discusses her group’s current research endeavors, including using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) to further understand the chemical relationship between environmental exposure and disease and elucidate micropollutants fate in the environment and biological systems.
GC–MS Targeted Analysis of PFAS Helps Expand Knowledge of Toxicokinetic Data
March 26th 2024Limited toxicokinetic and toxicologic information is available about a diverse set of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), but methods based on gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) can help unravel some of the mystery.
Best of the Week: What’s New in MS, 2024 Young Chemist Award Winner
March 22nd 2024This week, LCGC International published a variety of articles on the hottest topics in chromatography and beyond. Below, we’ve highlighted some of the most popular articles, according to our readers. Happy reading!