LCGC UST
News|Videos|November 28, 2025

Sustainability in the Lab: How Greener Practices are Reshaping Analytical Chemistry

The field of analytical chemistry is increasingly focused on sustainability, with green practices emerging as a key driver of innovation and efficiency. While the original principles of green chemistry were developed for synthetic chemistry, the analytical sector has adapted these ideas to emphasize efficiency, resource conservation, and environmental responsibility. Modern laboratories are finding that integrating miniaturization, automation, and more efficient methods not only reduces energy consumption and waste but also enhances workflow efficiency and reproducibility.

Historically, analytical chemists have prioritized efficiency in their methods, whether in sample preparation, instrument operation, or data analysis. This focus aligns closely with the goals of green chemistry, which promotes smarter use of materials and energy. However, the growing emphasis on sustainability is encouraging laboratories to challenge long-held assumptions and explore new approaches. For example, in capillary gas chromatography, nitrogen—often dismissed as a “less effective” carrier gas—can actually provide excellent performance while reducing environmental impact. Simple changes like this demonstrate that greener methods do not necessarily compromise data quality or operational effectiveness.

Automation and miniaturization play a central role in these efforts. Smaller instruments and automated workflows reduce energy requirements, limit consumable use, and lower laboratory footprints. By adopting these technologies, laboratories can maintain high analytical standards while supporting environmental stewardship.

The industry’s adoption of green analytical chemistry represents both a practical and philosophical shift. Laboratories are rethinking workflows, revisiting assumptions, and leveraging modern technologies to achieve more sustainable operations. Through these changes, the analytical chemistry field is not only reducing its environmental impact but also improving efficiency, reproducibility, and overall method quality—demonstrating that sustainability and scientific rigor can advance hand in hand.


Related to this article

Figure 2. Split injection used to measure triplicate test of MTBE, hexane, o-xylene, and 1-methylnaphthalene comparing different solvents (methanol, methylene chloride) and column insertion distances starting with 0.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 10.0 mm, 15 mm, and 20.0 mm. Methanol had the best performance at the 5.0 mm insertion distance and methylene chloride looked slightly better at the 0.5 mm. We would still recommend not going below the 5.0 mm manufacturer recommended insertion distance.
Revisiting insertion distance for methanol and methylene chloride in GC analysis and confirming that insertion depth strongly affects response and reproducibility.
Best of the Week: From Olive Waste to mRNA Vaccines
This week's Chromatography Online highlights include olive waste antioxidant recovery, food and tea analysis, EV isolation, mRNA vaccine purification, perfusion chromatography for oligonucleotides, mass spectrometry in teaching and career advice from “Women in Chromatography.”