The retention parameters defined in gas chromatography (GC) analysis using multiple temperature programs were comparable to those determined using isothermal GC measurements.
Researchers in the Food Chemistry department at the University of Bonn Institute of Nutritional and Food Sciences in Bonn, Germany, have published a study detailing what they call a fast and reliable method of delineating retention parameters based on a distribution-centric, three-parameter model using temperature-programmed gas chromatography (GC) (1). This approach allows for the estimation of retention behavior over a range of temperatures, which is useful for method development, optimization of GC techniques, and studying the effects of thermal gradients.
The study published in the Journal of Chromatography A uses Newton’s method with a trust region to determine the three parameters, and the column diameter, of solutes as a minima of the difference between retention times both measured and calculated. The determined parameters can subsequently be used in method development of GC separation simulation.
Newton's method refers to a mathematical algorithm used to estimate the retention parameters in GC. It involves iteratively refining the parameters by calculating the difference between measured and calculated retention times. The method employs a trust region approach, which allows for more reliable estimation of the parameters along with the column diameter.
In defining the GC process, distribution coefficient K represents the ratio of concentration in a solute in the stationary phase to concentration in the mobile phase. But K is also dependent on temperature, and the researchers sought to predict the separation of multiple solutes over varying conditions provided by a range of temperatures. Such a prediction could have practical applications in developing and optimizing new GC or multidimensional GC methods, or investigating new GC technologies such as the influence of thermal gradients.
Isothermal GC measurements are the direct way to determine K at temperature T, but obtaining such measurements is time-consuming, particularly where a wide variety of solutes with differing volatilities is concerned. Using temperature programming, conversely, allows a broad range of solutes and the volatility of each to be estimated in a small number of programmed runs.
In this study, the researchers found that if assumed column length or column diameter deviated from their true values, then the estimated retention parameters would also deviate from the isothermal estimates. However, even though retention time predictions were still usable, the parameters could not be used for other columns with the same stationary phase.
Therefore, the use of Newton’s method with a trust region, in which the parameters are estimated along with the column diameter (in other words, the L/d-ratio), could be advantageous if the L/d-ratio, either the length or diameter of the column or both, cannot be calculated.
Comparing this newer method to isothermal GC measurements, temperature programming showed good agreement, with deviations of less than 0.5% in Tchar, or the parameter of characteristic temperature. Retention times in additional temperature-programmed measurements were predicted with less than 0.7% deviation. For these reasons, temperature programming was seen as an improvement over isothermal measurements of retention parameters.
(1) Leppert, J.; Brehmer, T.; Wüst, M.; Boeker, P. Estimation of retention parameters from temperature programmed gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2023, 1699, 464008. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464008
Detangling the Complex Web of GC×GC Method Development to Support New Users
September 12th 2024The introduction of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) to the sample screening toolbox has substantially increased the ability to comprehensively characterize complex mixtures. However, for many gas chromatography (GC) users, the thought of having to learn to develop methods on a new technology is daunting. Developing a basic GC×GC method for most (nonspecialized) applications can be accomplished in minimal time and effort given parameter suggestions and ranges to target analytes in a sample of interest. In this article, the authors work describe a simple workflow to develop a GC×GC method for a specific sample upon initial use, with the aim of decreasing the time to accomplish functional workflows for new users.
Reliable Separation and Efficient Group-type Quantitation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs)
September 11th 2024Petroleum contamination from leaking underground storage tanks, for example, is a significant concern for both the environment and human health. Thorough characterization of the contamination is required to form appropriate risk assessments and remediation strategies, but until now, the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in soil has typically involved a convoluted and labour-intensive process. In this article, the analysis of TPH in environmental media is simplified using flow-modulated GC×GC–FID with quantitation based on pre-defined compound groupings. This approach overcomes the drawbacks of conventional solvent fractionation approaches, by eliminating the need for sample fractionation and automating data processing workflows.
The Reality Behind Column Insertion Distance
September 10th 2024Column insertion distance is critical to good chromatography. What happens if the column is installed too low in the injection port? Is insertion distance more important when performing split injection or splitless injection? Does the position of the column in the injection port impact reproducibility?