
- The Application Notebook-06-01-2012
- Volume 0
- Issue 0
Unique Effects of Two Mobile Phase Alcohols on the RegisPack CLA-1 Chiral Stationary Phase (CSP)
Typical chiral stationary phase (CSP) screening paradigms utilize a single alcohol component as co-solvent in its mobile phase. Recent unexpected observations have demonstrated that mixed-alcohol mobile phases can enhance or even introduce peak resolution when none existed in a mono-alcohol system.
Typical chiral stationary phase (CSP) screening paradigms utilize a single alcohol component as co-solvent in its mobile phase. Recent unexpected observations have demonstrated that mixed-alcohol mobile phases can enhance or even introduce peak resolution when none existed in a mono-alcohol system.
The standard protocol for screening with alcohol co-solvents such as ethanol, methanol, and isopropanol is to execute the screen with just a single alcohol. In this particular example, ethanol and methanol were used individually to perform the initial screen. When either alcohol alone was used, there was no resolution suitable for a preparatory scale separation. Select mixtures of the two alcohols showed an unexpected separation of the enantiomers of the racemate sample (compound structure is confidential).
Figure 1: Sample: proprietary; column: RegisPack® CLA-1 25 cm à 4.6 mm; mobile phase: 100% ethanol; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Unlike the unchlorinated RegisPack® amylose-based CSP, this study used the newer chlorinated (tris-(5-chloro-2-methylphenyl) carbamoyl amylose)-based RegisPack® CLA-1. The column dimensions were 25 cm × 4.6 mm using a 5 µm particle size.
Figure 2: Sample: proprietary; column: RegisPack® CLA-1 25 cm à 4.6 mm; mobile phase: 100% methanol; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Conclusion
Using neat alcohols will typically give acceptable peak resolution of a racemate, provided the CSP is appropriate. This particular compound, however, exhibited no peak resolution when using 100% of a single alcohol as co-solvent. Combinations of the two alcohols gave excellent baseline separations of the example compound. The solvent-CSP interaction, while not obvious, provides an interesting option when trying to develop conditions for difficult separations. Thus, when the two neat alcohols alone don't show promise, one should consider mixtures before ruling a screen unsuccessful.
Figure 3: Sample: proprietary; column: RegisPack® CLA-1 25 cm à 4.6 mm; mobile phase: ethanol/methanol (50/50); flow rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Figure 4: Sample: proprietary; column: RegisPack® CLA-1 25 cm à 4.6 mm; mobile phase: ethanol/methanol (75/25); flow rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Regis Technologies, Inc.
8210 Austin Ave, Morton Grove , IL 60053
Tel. (847) 583-7661, fax (847) 967-1214
E-mail:
Articles in this issue
over 13 years ago
The Analysis of 1,4-Dioxane for EPA Method 522 and UCMR 3over 13 years ago
Characterization of Polymeric Excipients by SEC-IRover 13 years ago
Brittleback in Polyimide Coated Capillary Tubingover 13 years ago
Rapid LC–MS-MS Analysis of Heterocyclic Amines in Salmonover 13 years ago
Detection of Protein Heterogeneity by HPLCNewsletter
Join the global community of analytical scientists who trust LCGC for insights on the latest techniques, trends, and expert solutions in chromatography.
