
Building Orthogonal Analytics Techniques for Molecule Characterization
Key Takeaways
- Identify which routine methods are typically used for release and in-process bioconjugate testing.
- Understand how decisions about routine versus extended characterization are based on throughput and regulatory risk.
Two analytical experts explain how they use orthogonal methods to characterize bioconjugates without creating workflow bottlenecks.
Episodes in this series

Sponsored by Waters Corporation
Relying on multiple orthogonal analytical techniques to fully characterize a bioconjugate can create operational bottlenecks if routine and characterization are not clearly defined. Zhengqi Zhang, Associate Principal Scientist at Merck & Co., describes how his team addresses this by using standardized, routine methods—such as hydrophobic interaction chromatography ultra-violet (HIC-UV) for drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), size exclusion chromatography (SEC) for high-molecular-weight species, capillary sodium dodecyl sulfate (CSDS) for size variants, and imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) for charge variants—for release and in-process testing. Decisions about which method to use are based on throughput needs and regulatory risk, with high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) methods such as SEC-MS, HIC-MS, and RPM reserved for extended characterization, investigations, or regulatory filings. Lance Cadang, Scientist, Synthetic Molecule Analytical Chemistry at Genentech adds that his team builds multi-attribute capability into methods from the start, while reserving techniques such as multiangle light scattering (MALS), analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), and MS for cross-checking high-molecular-weight species at later development stages. Both speakers describe MALS used alongside SEC to estimate the size of material underneath a chromatographic peak, while AUC is generally reserved for later-stage confirmation.


