Recent EU legislation on PFAS shifts from monitoring individual compounds toward managing them as a chemical class.
News|Articles|September 14, 2026
SFC: Perception, Cost, and the Path Beyond HPLC
Author(s)Tom DePhillipo, Kate Jones
Perception, not technology, remains the biggest barrier to supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) adoption, says JASCO's Tom DePhillipo.
Advertisement
Advertisement
What are the biggest misconceptions labs still have about supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) that keep them from adopting it?
Related to this article
Nicolai Zederkopff explores chromatography’s role to help implement the maximum tolerable level (MTL) framework for food adulteration to translate analytical results into compliance decisions.
Ed Ahearne highlights the benefits of ML-driven chromatography for the development of biopharmaceutical products
Ed Ahearne combined automation, machine learning, and Bayesian optimization to speed up method development for siRNA medicines.
Laura Righetti explains why quantification, not instrumentation, still keeps mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) out of routine food safety testing.
Anneli Kruve reports that toxicity predictions from MS2-derived molecular fingerprints outperform spectral-similarity methods in nontarget screening of food.
Gert Desmet offers his insights on the potential benefits AI/ML could offer the separation science community in the future.
Quantitative non-targeted screening with predicted response factors is not for regulation, but can rank environmental chemicals by concentration and toxicity.
Advertisement
Advertisement