Join the global community of analytical scientists who trust LCGC for insights on the latest techniques, trends, and expert solutions in chromatography.

Subscribe

Related Content

DDA vs DIA: Weighing Spectral Quality Against Setup Complexity

ByChristine M. Fisher,Kate Jones

June 23rd 2026

LC–MS/MS Detects MCI/MI in Danish Soaps and Shampoos

ByJohn Chasse

June 22nd 2026

Advanced Gas Chromatography Methods for Detecting PFAS Contamination in Soil

ByMaria Chiara Corviseri ,Flavio A. Franchina,John Chasse

Published: June 22nd 2026 | Updated: June 22nd 2026

More Tools for Sample Injection When Faced with Mobile Phase/Sample Solvent Mismatch

ByDwight R. Stoll

June 22nd 2026

Distinguishing True PFAS Signals from Sulfur-Containing Matrix Interferences

ByChristine M. Fisher,Kate Jones

June 22nd 2026

Vol 29 No 12 LCGC North America December 2011 Regular Issue PDF

Articles in this issue

Related Content

DDA vs DIA: Weighing Spectral Quality Against Setup Complexity

LC–MS/MS Detects MCI/MI in Danish Soaps and Shampoos

Advanced Gas Chromatography Methods for Detecting PFAS Contamination in Soil

More Tools for Sample Injection When Faced with Mobile Phase/Sample Solvent Mismatch

Distinguishing True PFAS Signals from Sulfur-Containing Matrix Interferences

Trending on LCGC International

Advanced Gas Chromatography Methods for Detecting PFAS Contamination in Soil

More Tools for Sample Injection When Faced with Mobile Phase/Sample Solvent Mismatch

Novel PFAS Detection via Mass Defect-Informed DDA

LC–MS/MS Detects MCI/MI in Danish Soaps and Shampoos

The Analytical Challenge: Detection, Quantification, and Method Development