LCGC Asia Pacific
Dionex Application Note
Bernard G. Sheldon,1 Rida Al-Horr2 and Rosanne Slingsby,1
1Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA,
2Dow Chemical, Houston, Texas, USA.
In ion chromatography, the presence of a large amount of matrix ions makes quantification of the target ions difficult. Selective removal of matrix ions — matrix elimination — can be performed by treating a sample with a solid-phase extractant. Halides can be removed by precipitation with silver, which is present as a counterion in a cation-exchange resin. A subsequent treatment with a cation-trapping column removes residual dissolved silver ions.
When analysing a sample for nitrite, it is important to maintain a high pH to preclude oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, which occurs readily at low pH. Therefore, sodium ion (Na+) should be used as the counterion on the silver-trapping column.
Solid-phase manual extraction columns, such as OnGuard II cartridges are useful for processing a limited number of samples; they are discarded after use with a single sample. Newly introduced InGuard cartridges provide automated in-line matrix elimination capabilities, which reduce sample-processing costs, increase processing reliability and enhance ease-of-method documentation and transfer.
InGuard cartridges are used in an ion chromatograph to treat samples before they are injected. The sample is metered with a sample loop and transferred to a concentrator column after being passed through the InGuard cartridge or cartridges. While InGuard cartridges have capacities similar to their OnGuard analogues, the InGuard cartridges will only be exposed to a small amount of sample per injection and, therefore, can be used many times before they are exhausted.
A Dionex ICS-3000 system with a DP dual pumping system and a detector compartment equipped with two 6-port valves was used here.
The first valve was a standard high-pressure 6-port injection valve equipped with a 100 μL sample loop. The second valve was a 6-port high-pressure valve installed on the automation manager of the DC. An InGuard Ag and an InGuard Na cartridge were plumbed in series between the two valves. The second pump transferred the sample from the sample loop through the cartridges and onto a concentrator column (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The passage of the sample through the InGuard cartridges may cause some dilution and band-broadening of the sample. A concentrator column traps and concentrates the sample into a small volume before injection onto the analytical column.
This application demonstrates the utility of a fully automated method with new InGuard Ag and Na in-line matrix elimination cartridges for removal of chloride from a sample before injection. If not removed, a 1.6% sodium chloride sample, as the one being analysed, would overwhelm the capacity of the analytical column used. The result would be an offscale peak with no resolution of the analytes of interest (Figure 2).
Figure 2
InGuard Ag cartridges contain approximately 5 mEq of silver ion, which is sufficient to remove the chloride from approximately 100 injections of 100 μL each of a 1.6% sodium chloride solution.
OnGuard, IonPac and ASRS are registered trademarks and InGuard is a trademark of Dionex Corporation.
Dionex Corporation
1228 Titan Way, PO Box 3603, Sunnyvale, California, USA
tel. +1 408 737 0700 fax +1 408 730 9403
Website: www.dionex.com
Modern HPLC Strategies: Improving Retention and Peak Shape for Basic Analytes
August 16th 2024In high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), it is common for bases and unreacted ionized silanols on silica-based columns to cause irreproducible retention, broad peaks, and peak tailing when working with basic analytes. David S. Bell, Lead Consultant at ASKkPrime LLC offers innovative HPLC strategies that can help mitigate such issues.
Reliable Separation and Efficient Group-type Quantitation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs)
September 11th 2024Petroleum contamination from leaking underground storage tanks, for example, is a significant concern for both the environment and human health. Thorough characterization of the contamination is required to form appropriate risk assessments and remediation strategies, but until now, the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in soil has typically involved a convoluted and labour-intensive process. In this article, the analysis of TPH in environmental media is simplified using flow-modulated GC×GC–FID with quantitation based on pre-defined compound groupings. This approach overcomes the drawbacks of conventional solvent fractionation approaches, by eliminating the need for sample fractionation and automating data processing workflows.
The Reality Behind Column Insertion Distance
September 10th 2024Column insertion distance is critical to good chromatography. What happens if the column is installed too low in the injection port? Is insertion distance more important when performing split injection or splitless injection? Does the position of the column in the injection port impact reproducibility?