Key Points
- Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are laboratory-made proteins that are growing in popularity. Membrane chromatography offers a promising solution for streamlining antibody purification, thanks to its ability to handle high processing volumes rapidly.
- The researchers created a mass transfer model for protein membranes. Unlike conventional media, the material was reported to have an unusual pattern with precise superposition of breakthrough curves.
- Researchers must differentiate between the contributions to the hydrodynamic dispersion from the chromatography system, the membrane housing, and the membrane material.
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna researchers worked alongside Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH personnel to create a new technique for the mass transfer of protein chromatography membranes. Their findings were published in the Journal of Chromatography A (1).
Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are laboratory-made proteins meant to stimulate a person’s immune system (2). They represent the most prevalent class of biopharmaceutical compounds, with their industrial production processes conducted in a series of unit operations, including generation from cell cultures involving several chromatographic steps. Typical processes include chromatographic affinity and ion-exchange steps, which are traditionally conducted using resin-filled columns. Resin chromatography is often constrained in terms of productivity, largely due to high pressure drops, resin compressibility, and slow mass transfer, forcing operations at low residence times (RT). Recently, convective membrane chromatography has become popular, with RT being significantly reduced due to convection-based mass transfer and lower pressure drops, albeit at the expense of specific surfaces, causing lower binding capacities (1).
In this research, the scientists created a mass transfer model for the protein A affinity membrane Sartobind® Rapid A. Experimental breakthrough curves performed at residence times between 3 and 60 s exhibited dynamic binding capacities at 10 % breakthrough between 30 and 50 g/L. Unlike conventional media, the material was reported to have an unusual pattern with precise superposition of breakthrough curves above 80% breakthrough and tailing off in a prolonged saturation phase. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of the membrane material revealed two regimes that were in the diameter ranges of approximately 5–20 µm. One regime had convective flow within it, while the other was dominated by diffusive transport. The chromatographic workstation and membrane housing were modeled separately using both continuously stirred tank reactors and dispersive plug flow reactors. A modified general rate model, taking various diffusive paths inside the stationary phase into account, successfully reproduced the experimentally observed trends (1).
It was noted, however, that the model had notable limitations. A second pathway may not always accurately depict diffusive pathways; as such, this belief must be considered a simplification. Further, the underlying mechanisms of pore diffusion limitation has not yet been elucidated. The potential role of diffusive pore size or a bridge size distribution within the stationary phase in this limitation needs to be investigated further (1).
Generally, independent measurements of the effective pore diffusion coefficient inside the membrane material would be preferred. However, experimental resin chromatography techniques cannot currently be employed for membranes. The housing volume exceeds the membrane volume by more than double, meaning that peak parking experiments with stopped flow exhibit low resolution, thus being prone to error. Additionally, the free diffusion coefficient is employed to calculate the effective pore diffusion coefficient. Any observed discrepancies in the experimental determination of the free diffusion coefficient would be incorporated into the effective pore diffusion coefficient (1).
In the context of membrane chromatography modeling, researchers must differentiate between the contributions to the hydrodynamic dispersion from the chromatography system, the membrane housing, and the membrane material. With this study, the system was described using a simplified version of a model, including two continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs)–which are reactors characterized by substrate blending systems that ensure high mixing levels in the reaction medium– to account for the system dead volume and one for a ultraviolet (UV) detector (3). In the future, the proposed model could help simulate and investigate mass transfer within other chromatographic media with modifications based on the same base material (1).
This study presents a comprehensive mass transfer model for Sartobind® Rapid A protein A membranes, offering valuable insights into the distinct transport mechanisms governing antibody capture in convective membrane systems. By integrating experimental data with a hybrid modeling approach that accounts for both convective and diffusive transport, the work provides a solid foundation for understanding and optimizing membrane-based chromatographic purification processes. While some simplifications in the model—such as assumptions about diffusion pathways—highlight areas for further refinement, the framework proves effective for describing key performance characteristics and supports its use in process development and scale-up. These findings underscore the potential of advanced membrane chromatography to replace or augment traditional resin-based systems in the biomanufacturing of monoclonal antibodies (1).
References
(1) Gehrmann, N.; Adametz, P.; Taft, F.; Thom, V.; Hahn, R. Modelling the Mass Transfer of a Polysaccharide-Based Protein A Chromatography Membrane with a Bimodal Porous Structure. J. Chromatogr. A 2025, 1756, 466057. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466057
(2) Monoclonal Antibodies. Cleveland Clinic 2021. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/22246-monoclonal-antibodies (accessed 2025-6-2)
(3) Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor. ScienceDirect 2021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/continuous-stirred-tank-reactor (accessed 2025-6-3)
