The Possibilities and Limitations of Capillary Extraction (CEx): The Case Study of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Clean-water Samples


LCGC Europe

LCGC EuropeLCGC Europe-09-01-2006
Volume 19
Issue 9
Pages: 484–496

Capillary extraction (CEx) is used to study the solventless in-tube extraction of naphthalene, acenaphthene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, chrysene, benzo(a)pyrene and coronene in aqueous samples prepared by analyte spiking into clean waters or, as an alternative, by using the generator–column method of sample preparation. Analysis of laden extractors is conveniently performed by high-resolution gas chromatography (GC), with a flameionization detector (FID). Extraction set-ups and main extraction variables are investigated from a practical point of view. For 2- to 4-ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), equilibrium times are within a few minutes, analytical sensitivity is in the parts-per-billion (ppb) range and reproducibility is better than 10% relative standard deviation (RSD) (n = 6). Coronene behaviour is unique and presumably determined by extreme hydrophobicity and thus very negligible aqueous solubility: in-tube extraction of coronene seems possible only if starting from oversaturated..


The analytical determination of PAHs is important because they represent a serious health risk for both human beings and ecosystems.1–6 Liquid–liquid extraction (usually followed by a concentration step) is the sample preparation approach classically used to analyse PAHs in aqueous samples.7,8 Nowadays, solventless extraction–preconcentration techniques are being studied to reduce solvent use. Among these, solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME)9–11 and stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE)12,13 have been successfully applied to aqueous sample analysis of PAHs.12,14–18 Both techniques exploit the high affinity of polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMS) towards hydrophobic substances.

Under pure absorptive conditions (partitioning), the amount mSil of an analyte taken from an aqueous phase into a polysiloxane gum phase, is given at equilibrium by

where KSil (the 'distribution constant' CSil/Cw) is the ratio between analyte concentration in the water-immiscible silicone phase and that in the aqueous phase at equilibrium; VSil and Vw are the volumes of PDMS and aqueous sample, respectively, Co is the initial analyte concentration in water.

When headspaces and/or adsorptive losses are not negligible, the distribution constant is given by

in which m°w is the initial analyte amount in water and mh and ma are the analyte amounts migrated into every available headspace and/or lost by adsorption, respectively.

Though a good correlation between octanol-water (Kow) and PDMS-water distribution constants may generally be found for several organic compounds, such a correlation fails with very hydrophobic molecules such as highly chlorinated PCBs19–26 or high-ring PAHs (Table 1). In such instances the extractive behaviour of PDMS gums may not be purely absorptive (i.e., "liquid-like") and hence Equations 1 and 2, as such, cannot be applied.

Table 1

Although capillary extraction (CEx)27 shares the same extraction principles with SPME and SBSE, these three techniques are clearly complementary to each other.27–32 For example, SPME and SBSE have slower extraction kinetics than CEx27,28,32 ; in addition, they are characterized by reduced accuracies with analytes whose volatility is either very high or very low,16,17 whereas CEx is more accurate during the analyte GC injection step.27

Without doubt, SBSE is the most sensitive technique because of a larger PDMS volume involved (25–200 µL, in comparison with ~ 0.5–1 µL used in SPME or 0.1–0.01 µL employed in CEx). However, this also implies substantial carryover risks. Interestingly, carryover is inherently null when using CEx (because of sound modalities of analyte injection27 used during analyte separation by GC) so the analytical possibilities of CEx towards PAHs are worth studying.

This article explores the performance of CEx for the extraction–preconcentration and subsequent gas chromatographic analysis of seven PAHs covering a wide range of physicochemical properties (from naphthalene to coronene). PAH water samples were prepared by fortifying simple matrixes (some purified waters or otherwise tap water) thus allowing better confidence in the results of the work.


Target analytes: Acenaphthene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, chrysene, and benzo(a)pyrene were supplied by Supelco (PAH Kit 610-N, Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA). Naphthalene was recrystallized (ethanol) from naphthalene for scintillation counting (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Coronene source was the BCR 388 standard reference material obtained from the Community Bureau of Reference, Brussels, Belgium. All PAHs were of + 99% purity, except chrysene, which was 93% pure.

PAH stock solutions: A few milligrams of each PAH were weighed (± 0.01 mg) separately in screw-cap glass vials that were reweighed after addition of a couple of millilitres of methanol, or isopropanol or tetrahydrofuran (THF); the vials were immediately capped and manually shaken to solubilize the PAH crystals. The single-standard solutions were combined in a mixture that was aimed to contain 10–4 mol L–1 of every PAH, such as naphthalene (13 mg L–1 ), acenaphthene (15 mg L–1 ), phenanthrene (17 mg L–1 ), fluoranthene (20 mg L–1 ), chrysene (23 mg L–1 ), benzo(a)pyrene (25 mg L–1 ), and coronene (30 mg L–1 ). This mixture was aliquoted into several glass ampules that were sealed by fusion and stored in the laboratory refrigerator at 4 °C.

Aqueous PAH samples: Aqueous samples were prepared by two different approaches: (a) the classical "spiking" method and (b) the generator column one.39

(a) Calculated amounts of the 10–4 mol L–1 PAH solution (see above) were added with a microsyringe into the intended volumes of matrix water kept under lively magnetic stirring. Sample containers, which were made of unsilanized glass, were rinsed in advance with plenty of the PAH solutions they were going to contain.

(b) Weighed amounts of solid PAHs [naphthalene (101.0 mg), acenaphthene (61.0 mg), phenanthrene (45.0 mg), fluoranthene (53.0 mg), chrysene (14.0mg), benzo(a)pyrene (8.0 mg), coronene (1.30 mg)] were dissolved in a few millilitres of dichloromethane and the resulting solution was evaporated on to non-porous alumina powder (3.5 g, density 3.6 g mL–1 , 100–200 mesh). The resulting free-flowing powder was dry-packed into a Hibar stainless steel tube 30 cm × 0.4 cm i.d., carrying 1/16in. end fittings and 2 µm stainless steel frits (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). A second Hibar generator column, which was conceived to avoid an early naphthalene depletion, was made essentially in the same manner except that it contained substantially more naphthalene (570 mg).

A steady flow of a nearly-saturated aqueous solution of the seven target PAHs was prepared by pumping the water matrix at 0.5–1 mL min–1 (by a HPLC pump) through the tandem system made up with the two generator columns just described, connected in series. The tandem system provided plenty of freshly prepared PAH-saturated water, the composition of which was, within the variability of laboratory temperature (± 2 °C), constant for all practical purposes.

Water matrices: Three kinds of clean waters were used as matrices:

  • "pure" water coming from an age-old MilliQ water purification system (Millipore SA, France)

  • pure water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ × cm, provided by a recently bought MilliQ Gradient purification system (Millipore SpA, Milan, Italy)

  • tap water from the laboratory faucet, having a specific conductivity of about 350 µS cm–1 at 25 °C.

Stirbars: For sample mixing, several home-made glass-coated stir-bars of convenient small sizes (1–2 cm long, 1–3 mm as external diameter) were used. Glass-coated stirrers were preferred to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) ones to reduce PAH losses and memory effects.15,22,33 Magnetic stirring was not needed to perform CEx experiments but only required in the preparation of the aqueous samples by the PAH-spiking method.

Sample delivering methods: The intimate contact between (in-tube) moving aqueous samples and stationary extractant layers was obtained using three options:

  • Syringe squeeze method: Sample was "squeezed" manually through a capillary extractor (or an extractor stack — see below) with a single syringe or by placing the extractor between two identical syringes operated alternatively ("double-syringe" set-up).31 Syringes (SGE Scientific Pty, Melbourne, Australia) had glass bodies, PTFE-tip plungers, metal needles and volume capacities which spanned from 2 to 5 mL. In order to be connected easily with capillary extractors each syringe under use required its own fused silica transfer-line.27

  • Pump method: Sample was delivered towards capillary extractor(s) either by means of a single head DQP1 piston pump (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, USA), or using a double head APM-2 piston pump (also from Dionex). The flow path of these pumps included some PTFE tube, the removal of which was impracticable.

  • Gas pressurization: Capillary extractor(s) were fed with sample by using the hand-regulated pushing action of helium gas at 0.1–5 kg cm–2 . A Sovirel screw-cap glass vial of 30 mL capacity was the sample vessel; it was externally covered with adhesive tape to avoid the possibility of flying splinters should the glass rupture. Two leak-proof holes made in the vial cap allowed for gas pressurization and simultaneous sample delivering through a 50 cm piece of 0.32 mm i.d. raw fused silica tube.

Salting-out recipe: Increasing amounts (0.19–0.38–0.59–0.80–0.97 g) of reagent grade sodium chloride (purity + 99.5%, Riedel-de Haën, Seelze, Germany) were weighed into 4 mL screw-cap vials. Matrix water (3.50 mL) was added to each vial that was presently sealed. Magnetic stirring assured rapid salt dissolution. By means of a micro-syringe, 1.2 µL of the 10–4 mol L–1 PAH stock solution was added to each vial below the surface of the stirred liquid. Extractions were then performed on 2 mL of these solutions (10 µg L–1 coronene nominal concentration), using the double-syringe set-up described above.

Capillary extractors: Uncoated but deactivated extractors: Duran raw-glass capillaries of various inner diameters (0.2–0.3 mm) and lengths between 5 and 30 m were leached with 20% HCl, rinsed with 0.5% HCl, dried under vacuum at 250 °C and then persilylated at 400 °C with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), diphenyltetramethyldisilazane (DPTMDS) or their 1:1 v/v mixture.34 Finally, uncoated but deactivated extractors were easily obtained by trimming off the coiled hanks of persililated capillaries and by moulding extractor ends like press-fits.27,35,36

  • Coated extractors: Fabrication details of coated capillary extractors can be found elsewhere.27 Briefly, they were made by trimming off glass HRGC columns prepared by static coating34 of polydimethylsiloxane gum PS255 (1% vinyl groups) or OV17 (50% phenyl) polyphenylmethylsiloxane stationary phases (Fluka, Italy) into Duran borosilicate glass capillaries. After polysiloxane immobilization by dicumylperoxide crosslinking and thermal conditioning at 330 °C, plenty of new extractors of usual lengths (10–20 cm) could be prepared simply by trimming short pieces from the newly prepared hanks and moulding the ends of these pieces like press-fits.27

  • Snaked extractors: Such extractors were prepared starting from some of the aforementioned coated extractors that were put under slow helium flow and subjected to a localized but quick glassblowing action (within the tiniest alcohol flame). About 40 bends were made that were 5–6 mm apart from each other. As soon as a brief conditioning at 330 °C under inert gas flow was performed the newly prepared snaked extractors were ready for use.

CEx modalities for the PAH linearity check: 2 mL aliquots of aqueous PAHs solutions (in tap water) with nominal coronene concentrations from 5 to 45 µg L–1 were extracted using a PS255 coated capillary extractor 10 cm × 0.21 mm i.d. × df = 0.30 µm mounted according to the double syringe set-up. Each sample required 2 min to pass 10 times (i.e., 5 cycles) through the extractor. Regression lines were plotted using average data from duplicate extractions.

GC analysis: Analyte separations were performed by manually mounting each PAH-laden capillary extractor as a precolumn28 into the oven of a PerkinElmer 8500 gas chromatograph provided with a PS255 glass capillary column that was 10 m long × 0.21 mm i.d. × df = 0.30 µm. FID temperature was 350 °C. No GC injector hardware was required (see below); this advantage is peculiar of the CEx technique independently of analyte volatility.27 The carrier gas was electrolytic hydrogen delivered at a constant pressure of 14 psig. Borwin software (Jasco SpA, Como, Italy) was employed both to acquire the detector signal (at a sampling rate of 10 Hz) and to review the chromatographic data.

Before GC elution, the laden capillary extractors were drained from the aqueous sample excess which was filling the capillary hold-up volume (it was sufficient to keep each extractor vertically while touching its lower end onto kimwipe paper, though longer extractors required a slow-sucking peristaltic pump). Finally, each laden extractor was mounted in the same way as a precolumn28 and GC analysis performed by starting the following oven temperature programme: 80 °C for 0.4 min; 30 °C min–1 up to 320 °C, final hold of 3 min. Total run time was 11.4 min.

Results and Discussion

Analysis of PAHs by "immersion SPME"-FID provides detection limits in the ppb-ppt range9,21,37 with 10–20% RSD precision. Equilibration times of high-ring PAHs are, however, rather long10,19,20,38 compared with the aqueous samples ageing rate.8,39 Possibility of leaks out of sample containers and adsorption onto their walls, interphase transfers, biodegradation, all suggest that sample preparations of aqueous samples are recommended to be completed in the shortest time. Even headspace-SPME38,40 is not rapid enough for highring PAHs.

CEx may reduce both extraction equilibrium time and sample volume constraints in comparison with its sister techniques42 by the use of very thin extractant films (0.01–1 µm). In this way, sample-to-extractant volume ratios of about 105 –106 may be commonly employed.41

The concept of PAH preconcentration from aqueous samples by using nothing more than a HRGC column was pioneered about 15 years ago by Kaiser and Rieder.43 They used the whole capillary GC column normally devoted to GC analyses both to extract and thereafter to separate the extracted substances by high resolution gas chromatography (HRGC) with FID detection. That procedure, though achieving parts-per-trillion sensitivity, required uncommon skill and prolonged contact between the main GC column and the aqueous samples under examination. Conversely, in the CEx approach, GC analytical columns are not exposed to any liquid water contact, which only involves capillary extractors.

Extractor functioning and peculiarity of coronene behaviour: PDMS extracts PAHs by non-specific interactions (namely dispersion and induction forces) that can be very easily broken (e.g., by rise of temperature) because of the low surface tension of PDMS (only 21.5–10–3 J m–2 ).45

Although thin-film apolar capillary extractors had a residual hydrogen-bonding activity toward basic solutes,28 which usually increased somewhat with use, no significant degradation of CEx–GC performance concerning PAHs was noticed during this study: the capillaries were reused with success independently from their size or film thickness, so capillary extractors' reusability was appreciated throughout the study.

Similarly to SPME or SBSE, the static liquid layer adhering to the internal wall of capillary extractors opposes a diffusion resistance to analyte mass-transport,46–48 which is lower the higher the velocity (i.e., the flow-rate) of the moving liquid sample. At high flows, the resistance to diffusion into the silicone extractant33,49,50 may be a main limiting factor of analyte transport.

Figure 1

In general, however, to raise the speed of extraction, PDMS film thickness should be as thin as possible. The thinnest conceivable apolar films are produced by persilanization34 and indeed the extraction speed afforded by persilanized capillaries was very high. The example reported in Figure 1 refers to two CEx–GC analyses performed on different portions (24 and 40 mL) of a sample prepared with the PAH generator columns tandem system described above. Here, the excellent qualitative and quantitative agreement of the overlaid chromatograms testifies these extractions had reached full equilibrium. Chrysene and benzo(a)pyrene were sensitively detected (their concentrations in the sample were 2 ppb and 4 ppb, respectively) but coronene went undetected, as usual in samples prepared by the generator column method. Coronene behaviour, however, was different when CEx was performed on samples prepared by spiking.

Figure 2 refers to one of these cases. Here a persilanized capillary was used to extract a diluted PAH sample prepared either in very pure water (run 'a') or in tap water (runs 'b' and 'c'). As recurrently observed, the extraction of coronene was much easier when the matrix medium was tap water rather than the highest purity (MilliQ) water. Since coronene extraction was never obtained using those samples prepared with the generator column method (a situation which ruled out the possibility of finding suspended coronene crystals in resulting samples), the author believes that coronene bewildering behaviour in spiked samples was caused by the adsorption of coronene microcrystals onto the internal walls of apolar capillary extractors. Certainly the subject would deserve further studies.

Figure 2

Among the different matrix waters evaluated, the one obtained from the age-old MilliQ system was spoiled with traces of organic solvents as well as phthalates and hence it was used only for comparison purposes. Thus the matrices most often used were either tap water (which somehow made coronene extraction possible, as seen in Figure 2) or otherwise very pure deionized water (in which coronene extraction was in general extremely difficult).

CEx linearity trial: Paying attention to the behaviour of the less soluble PAHs (see above) the CEx linearity experiments were done on water samples prepared by PAH spiking. A multipoint calibration was performed between 5 and 45 µg L–1 using 2 mL sample aliquots, the double-syringe set-up and a PS255-coated capillary extractor 10 cm × 0.21 mm i.d. × df = 0.3 µm (thus containing 0.020 µL of the extractant). The overall contact time for every CEx experiment (5 cycle, i.e.,10 sample passages through the capillary) was 100 ± 5 s.

Figure 3

Calculated 3σ detection limits in units of µg L–1 were naphthalene (8.5), acenaphthene (1.8), phenanthrene (1.1), fluoranthene (0.40), chrysene (2.1), and coronene (~ 40). Figure 3 summarizes the calibration results both for low-ring PAHs and high-ring PAHs (right diagram). The linear correlation coefficient (r2 ) for naphthalene was 0.954 while it was 0.991, 0.970 and 0.995 for acenaphthene, phenanthrene and fluoranthene, respectively. Chrysene, benzo(a)pyrene and coronene nominal concentrations were clearly above their solubility limit. Note that despite a very short extraction time and troubles caused by oversaturation, analytical sensitivity (FID detection) was easily at low ppb levels.

PAH absorption profiles: The study of PAH extraction profiles was of obvious interest. A 5 ppb PAH sample in tap water was cycled for an increasing number of times between master and slave syringes (same extractor and set-up as used for the linearity trial). The CEx extraction profiles are reported in Figure 4. Fluoranthene and the lighter PAHs reached extraction equilibrium within 10 passages (i.e., in less than 2.5 min); the trends of extracted amounts passed through a maximum and then lowered down slightly (an effect caused by unwanted but unavoidable analytes' losses onto syringes, transfer-lines etc.). Even if a single sample passage was unable to extract coronene significantly, within 60 crossings it was the most extracted PAH. The (almost) linear extraction profile of coronene suggests that (a) the sample was coronene-oversaturated and (b) the PDMS coating might have been crowded with coronene microcrystals physically adsorbed onto it.

Figure 4

Very similar qualitative profiles and even faster extraction kinetics were obtained by capillary extractors coated with thinner films. In particular, a PS255 extractor carrying a 0.048 film was able to reach extraction equilibrium for naphthalene, acenaphthene and phenanthrene within a single passage (34 s). This extraction speed is remarkably high in comparison with SPME, SBSE or the extraction approach, which uses packed-PDMS columns.33

Flow-rate effects: Sample flow-rate has in CEx the same role that sample stirring has in SPME,40 so a meaningful impact of sample flow-rate on the extraction yields of PAHs was indeed expected. It was, however, noted that the effect of flow-rate was better understood by using the pressurized glass vial described above rather than by means of mechanical piston pumps; that is because sample integrity with time was better retained with the former approach. The left graph of Figure 5 shows the resulting extraction profiles of target analytes: fluoranthene and the lighter PAHs reached extraction equilibrium within 2.5 minutes, while both chrysene and benzo(a)pyrene required roughly 17 min to approach it substantially. As expected, the extraction speeds (right graph) increased almost linearly as the static liquid layer became thinner at higher sample flows. Both naphthalene and coronene were undetected: the former owing to a low KSil, the latter because of its very negligible solubility in water (the probable presence of solid particles caused by oversaturation deviated the extractions away from simple partition principles).

Figure 5

OV-17 vs. PS255 extractant: To test if a change in the aromatic character of the silicone coating would have had a promising effect on the CEx of PAHs, the performance of a 10 cm × 0.21 mm i.d. × df = 0.3 µm capillary extractor, containing 0.022 µL of PS255, was compared with that of a OV17 extractor (13 cm × 0.24 mm i.d. × df = 0.15 µm) containing 0.015 µL of stationary phase. The cited extractors were connected in series (see below) and then 23 mL of a 5 ppb PAH sample were passed through the stack at about 3 mL min–1 using the pressurized vial set-up. The results confirmed the usefulness of the "like dissolves like" principle. In comparison to the PAH amounts extracted with the PS255 extractor (assuming it as the 100% benchmark) and notwithstanding a lower extractant volume, the OV17 capillary extracted (168 ± 5)% acenaphthene, (175 ± 2)% phenanthrene, (162 ± 2)% fluoranthene, (107 ± 26)% chrysene, and (111 ± 7)% benzo(a)pyrene (average ± RSD of two replicates).

'In-series' assemblage of capillary extractors: Multiple extractions of PAHs could be performed simultaneously with the use of a chain of extractors, with advantages both in terms of time-saving and uniformity of temperature and hydrodynamics. One drawback of this "in-series" approach was, however, that at low flow-rates (less than 0.2 mL min–1 ) the high-ring PAHs were preferentially extracted by those extractors nearest to the sample inlet. On the base of break-through concepts51 this discrimination effect should have been negligible at higher sample flow-rates.

Such a hypothesis was indeed found to be true. In particular, by connecting together six identical PS255 extractors of typical size, recycling through them a PAH sample at a relatively high flow-rate for a suitable time, then stopping the flow and analysing the laden capillaries one at a time; the CEx variability within the extractor chain gave a results of less than 10% RSD for each analyte (Table 2).

Table 2

The array disposition was also advantageous to speed up the study of extraction-time profiles, since data points could be acquired while the main extraction trial was still proceeding. Following this idea, a chain of seven typical extractors (10 cm × 0.21 mm i.d. × 0.3 µm PS255) was fed with a 1 ppb PAH-spiked tap water sample at 2.7 mL min–1 (DQP-1 pump). It resulted that fluoranthene and chrysene reached extraction equilibrium after 27 and 37 min, respectively; Benzo(a)pyrene approached equilibrium after 266 mL (99 min) whereas coronene was extracted at nearly constant speed (i.e., it was very far from equilibrium). (Expectedly, when extractors' film thickness was reduced from 0.3 to 0.1 µm, equilibrium time for fluoranthene and chrysene lowered to 5 and 20 min respectively).

The in-series approach provided an easy way to compare the performance of differing capillary extractors. A chain of three extractors of the same size but different df , for example, was used to clarify the influence of film thickness on CEx of the PAHs. The experiment lasted enough time (0.5 h) to allow partition equilibrium to be reached throughout the chain. It was found, in fact, that for fluoranthene the extracted amounts were strictly proportional to the PDMS volumes; Enrichment of chrysene and benzo(a)pyrene in the thicker coatings, however, was less than expected. Coronene behaviour, again, was uncommon: its extracted amount was almost the same independently from df, thus suggesting a mechanism based (mainly) on adsorption rather than partition. Moreover, if coronene had been partitioned into PDMS its capillary extraction would have been affected by solvent swelling,27 (i.e., by the increase of PDMS volume caused by the contact with plenty of a hydrophobic solvent)52–54 but actually it was the only PAH which was unaffected.

Salting-out effects: It is known that PAH extraction from aqueous samples can be influenced by sample salting.55

The performance of CEx vs. salt concentration was tested. Sensitivity for naphthalene and acenaphthene increased steadily by increasing NaCl concentration (Figure 6). Phenanthrene had a maximum near 20% of salt, that lowered to approximately 10% for fluoranthene, and disappeared for chrysene and benzo(a)pyrene. Coronene was the least influenced analyte, its extraction remaining a challenge independently from the concentration of NaCl.

Figure 6

Temperature influence: CEx extraction of chrysene, benzo(a)pyrene and coronene (chromatograms not shown) was more effective at 65 °C than at room temperature by 300–500%. On the contrary, naphthalene and fluoranthene decreased their extraction yield because of the lowering of KSil at increased temperatures. The intermediate-size PAHs were not remarkably affected by the rise of temperature; The increased mass transport at the higher temperature was evidently counterbalanced by the corresponding decrease of KSil.40

Snaked extractors: It is known from HPLC theory that a radial flow (obtained for example by including coiled connecting tubes in the flow path) modifies the common parabolic profile of mobile phase velocities so that convective mass-transport is enhanced and taller peaks can be obtained. It was hence interesting to test if CEx efficiency could be influenced by radial flows.

The shape of some typical (linear) extractors was thus modified to be serpentine-like46 and the extractors used in a set of CEx experiments. These "snaked-extractors" were slightly more active than "linear" ones because of the thermal treatment required to make from 30 to 40 bends (PAHs, however, were nearly insensitive to this sort of activity). The mass exchange kinetics of snaked capillaries always resulted higher than those of unmodified extractors (Figure 7), confirming the usefulness of radial flows — enhanced turbulence and therefore thinner static liquid layer — in order to speed-up the capillary microextraction. Gain was remarkable for chrysene and benzo(a)pyrene and contact time was very brief (less than 3 min). Coronene, however, went undetected even with snaked extractors.

Figure 7

Sensitive detection of benzo(a)pyrene: In striking contrast to the difficulties of coronene detection, traces of benzo(a)pyrene were generally detected both sensitively and quickly by means of long, thinly-coated capillary extractors (df ≤ t; 0.1 µm). One of such CEx-HRGC analyses, referring to a 1 ppb PAH sample, is shown in Figure 8. Despite the very brief contact time (2.5 min), the 3σ detection limit of benzo(a)pyrene gave a result of 10 ng L–1 , whereas coronene was only barely detected (probably as a result of a coronene-free concentration that was substantially lower than that of benzo(a)pyrene). The retention gap effect, which is indeed typical of thinly coated capillary extractors, gave excellent peak shape. Some extraction profiles are shown in Figure 9: the lower-ring PAHs had equilibration times of a few minutes, whereas benzo(a)pyrene was strongly enriched into the extractor. The extrapolated equilibration time was about 25–30 min. Benzo(a)pyrene uptake was so strong that it simultaneously affected the overall polarity of the stationary phase and hence, very clearly, the partition equilibrium of naphthalene (data not shown).44


The solventless determination of PAHs in clean waters by capillary extraction-HRGC–FID is characterized by the absence of carryover, notably high extraction speeds, operative simplicity and use of extractors which are both cheap and reusable. Sample salting, rise of sample temperature and use of snaked extractors are means to favourably influence the detection of PAHs. Chain (in-series) extractors are useful in determining CEx reproducibility and in the study of extraction profiles. CEx analytical reproducibility (RSD) is in the 6–10% range and sensitivity is at the parts-per-billion level. Thinly coated capillary extractors are effective for the determination of high-ring PAHs. Benzo(a)pyrene, in particular, can be detected down to 10 ppt.

Figure 8

Coronene extraction is, in general, very hard to perform, especially from spiked samples prepared in very pure waters rather than tap water. In this study, coronene has never been detected in those aqueous samples prepared by generator columns.

The puzzling coronene behaviour may depend on

  • an extremely low aqueous solubility

  • the almost certain presence of suspended coronene microparticles in those samples prepared by spiking

  • the possibility of these particles to be uniquely latched by an adsorption mechanism onto the apolar coatings of capillary extractors.

Figure 2

Luigi Nardi is research chemist at the Casaccia research centre of National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment (ENEA), Rome, Italy. His interest in chromatographic techniques has focused in HPLC and HRGC columns' preparation and in the implementation of user-friendly and cheap solvent-less sample preparation procedures in view of HRGC analysis. For direct correspondence with the author contact:


1. A. Bjørseth (ed) Handbook of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, (Marcel Dekker, NewYork, USA, 1985).

2. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Pt.136, Appendix A, Methods 601–1625, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA (1988).

3. Methods for the determination of organic compounds in drinking water, EPA/600/4-88/039, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA (1988).

4. Test methods for evaluating solid waste, SW-846, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA (1995).

5. D.J. Futoma et al., Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water systems, CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, USA (1981).

6. A. Barranco et al., J. Chromatogr. A, 988, 33 (2003).

7. M.S. Klee and C.K. Meng, 'Simple automatic sampling techniques that save time, money, and increase the quality of analysis'. 23rd International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography, on CD-ROM. Riva del Garda, Italy, June 5–10 (2000).

8. M. Sliwska-Kaszynska, A. Kot-Wasik and J. Namiesnik, Crit. Rev. Envir. Sci. Technol., 33, 31 (2003).

9. Sheppers Wercinski SA (ed). Solid Phase Microextraction – A practical guide, Marcel Dekker, New York, USA (1999).

10. Pawliszyn J (ed). Application of Solid Phase Microextraction, RCS Chromatography Monographs, Cambridge, UK (1999).

11. J. Pawliszyn (ed). Solid Phase Microextraction -– Theory and practice, Wiley-VCH, New York, USA (1997).

12. E. Baltussen et al., J. Microcol. Sep., 11, 737 (1999).

13. E. Baltussen, C. Cramers and P. Sandra, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 373, 3 (2002).

14. P. Popp et al., J. Chromatogr. A, 897, 153 (2000).

15. A. Paschke, P Popp and G. Schüürmann, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 363, 426 (1999).

16. P. Popp, C. Bauer and L. Wennrich, Anal. Chim. Acta, 436, 1 (2001).

17. P. Popp et al., J. Sep. Sci., 26, 961 (2003).

18. A. Paschke and P. Popp, J. Chromatogr. A, 999, 35 (2003).

19. A. Paschke, P. Popp and G. Schüürmann, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 360, 52 (1998).

20. R. Doong and S. Chang, Anal. Chem., 72, 3647 (2000).

21. J. Langenfeld, S. Hawthorne and D. Miller, Anal. Chem., 68, 144 (1996).

22. Y. Yang et al., Anal. Chem., 70, 1866 (1998).

23. Y. Yang, D. Miller and S. Hawthorne, J. Chromatogr. A, 800, 257 (1998).

24. T. Górecki and J. Pawliszyn, Analyst, 122, 1079 (1997).

25. I. Valor et al., J. Sep. Sci., 24, 39 (2001).

26. L. Urruty and M. Mountury, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 37, 277 (1999).

27. L. Nardi, J. Chromatogr. A, 1017, 1 (2003).

28. L. Nardi, Am. Lab., 34, 30 (2002).

29. L. Nardi, In-tube SPME for trace determination of organic compounds in water by HRGC. 23rd International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography: on CD-ROM. Riva del Garda, Italy, June 5-10 (2000).

30. L. Nardi, Italian Patent RM2000A000301 (2000).

31. L. Nardi, J. Chromatogr. A, 985, 39 (2003).

32. L. Nardi, J. Chromatogr. A, 985, 93 (2003).

33. E. Baltussen et al., J. Chromatogr. A, 805, 237 (1998).

34. K. Grob Making and Manipulating Capillary Columns for Gas Chromatography, Huethig, Heidelberg, Germany (1986).

35. L. Nardi, J. High Resol. Chromatogr., 21, 625 (1998).

36. B. Schilling, J. Chromatogr., 435, 204 (1988).

37. D. Potter and J. Pawliszyn, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 298 (1994).

38. R. Doong, S. Chang and Y. Sun, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 38, 528 (2000).

39. W. May, S. Wasik and D. Freeman, Anal. Chem., 50, 175 (1978).

40. Z. Zhang and J. Pawliszyn, Anal. Chem., 65, 1843 (1993).

41. R. Grob (ed)) Modern practice of Gaschromatography, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, pp. 463 (1985).

42. T. Górecki, A. Khaled and J. Pawliszyn, Analyst, 123, 2819 (1998).

43. R. Kaiser and R. Rieder, J. Chromatogr., 477, 49 (1989).

44. D. Mackay and W. Shiu, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 22, 399 (1977).

45. H. Rotzsche, Stationary phases in Gas Chromatography, Elsevier Science B.V., p.191 (1991).

46. R. Scott, J. Liq. Chrom. Rel. Technol., 17, 2567 (2002).

47. A. Oomen and P. Mayer and J. Tolls, Anal. Chem., 72, 2802 (2000).

48. D. Louch, S. Motlagh and J. Pawliszyn, Anal. Chem., 64,1187 (1992).

49. A. Urtiaga, E. Gorri and I. Ortiz, AIChE Journal, 48, 572 (2002).

50. M. Chang, S. Wu and C. Chen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 2307 (1997).

51. H. Mol, H. Janssen and C. Cramers, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.,16, 413 (1993).

52. S. Johansen and J. Pawliszyn, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.,11, 627 (1996).

53. A. Louter, J. Vreuls and U. Brinkman, J. Chromatogr. A,842, 391 (1999).

54. S. Folestad and M. Larsson, J. Chromatogr., 394, 455 (1987).

55. W. May, Petroleum in the marine environment; Advances in Chemistry Series N° 185, American Chemical society, Washington DC, Chapter 7 (1980).

Related Videos
Toby Astill | Image Credit: © Thermo Fisher Scientific
Related Content