Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and ion chromatography profile wasabi and mustard heat and acidity.
|Webcasts|June 1, 2017
A Risk-Based Approach to Reviewing Electronic Chromatographic Data and Audit Trails with Data Integrity in Mind
Author(s)Waters Corporation
There is a struggle to adequately “document” audit trail review, which leads to the wider concern-how to adequately document any kind of quality review. What exactly does “signing a document” indicate? On Demand available until Jun. 1, 2018 Register Free: http://www.chromatographyonline.com/lcgc_w/data
Register Free:
Since Annex 11 first raised in regulation the need for audit trail review, there has been much discussion in industry about how to ensure that information contained in electronic audit trails is reviewed along with the actual data and other meta data.
Amongst the plethora of data integrity guidances issued by regulatory authorities, there appears to be a mixture of expectations, including some truly non risk-based approaches indicating a need for 100% review. In many companies audit trail review always formed a part of any data review SOP. Some companies have since attempted to create a separate audit trail review SOP, without much thought to the quality and value this exercise adds. Additionally there is a struggle to adequately “document” audit trail review, which leads to the wider concern-how to adequately document any kind of quality review. What exactly does “signing a document” indicate?
Speaker: Heather Longden, Senior Marketing Manager, Informatics and Regulatory Compliance, Waters Corporation
Date and Time:
Live: Thursday, 1 June, 2017 | 10 am EDT | 9 am CDT | 1500 BST | 1600 CEST
After the final airing of the webcast 1 June, 2017 it will be available on demand until 1 June, 2018.
Sponsor: Waters Corporation
Register Free:
Related to this article
How feasible is it to integrate this Bayesian graph-theory methodology into existing commercial chromatography software workflows for semi-automated data curation in routine analytical laboratories?
Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) show frequent milking alters cobra venom toxin makeup.
Gabriel Vivó-Truyols outlines the benefits and challenges of combining graph theory with Bayesian statistics to automate peak assignment and alignment.
This week, Chromatography Online’s coverage spanned lipidomics-based early cancer detection, career paths in separation science, machine learning and uncertainty-driven approaches to LC method development, new EU wastewater rules for pharmaceutical micropollutants, automated Separation Quality Factor (SQF) evaluation in chromatography data systems, and solutions to GLP-1 peptide analysis challenges.
Gabriel Vivó-Truyols from the Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Madrid, Spain. discusses his work on using graph theory and Bayesian statistics for peak assignment and chromatographic alignment.
Gas chromatography (GC) analysis ties prenatal mindfulness to shifts in placental fatty acids.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC–qTOF–MS) reveal metabolic shifts in tricuspid regurgitation.
Trending on LCGC International
1
GLP-1 Peptide Analysis: Challenges and Solutions
2
HPLC–DAD Method Tracks Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Stability
3
Industry Roundup: Waters Posts Strong Third Quarter as LC–MS and Chromatography Consumables Drive Growth, Acquires Ion Mobility Pioneer MOBILion
4
LC–MS/MS Dried Blood Spot Test for Galactosemia
5