Kevin A. Schug

A top-down approach to quantifying intact proteins from biological fluids using liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole–mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) offers the potential for more absolute quantitation than bottom-up approaches. To make this broadly viable, however, commercial sample preparation tools are needed.

The “State-of-the-Art in Capillary Liquid Chromatography” panel discussion at the 43rd International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography (ISCC 2019) in Fort Worth, Texas, USA, was a thoughtful dialogue on current challenges and potential future directions in the field. The session included a general overview of the current state of the field, key drawbacks preventing widespread use of capillary liquid chromatography (LC) columns, and how these challenges might be overcome. In this article, we highlight some of the common themes that were discussed as part of this panel.

Looking back, the start of my penning of blog articles matches quite well with the start of efforts to investigate the potential environmental impacts of unconventional oil and gas extraction, and the formation of the Collaborative Laboratories for Environmental Analysis and Remediation (CLEAR; http://clear.uta.edu) at the University of Texas Arlington. It also well coincided with my effort to begin some outside consulting activities, predominantly the review of forensics evidence for blood alcohol determination. Both of these activities have blossomed considerably in the past seven years, and it has become interesting to contemplate the most rewarding way to spend my time going forward.

I run into scientists all the time who have never heard the term exposome. Most are not intimately connected in the analytical world; these days, analytical scientists seemingly expect “ome” and “omics” to be tacked onto pretty much anything.

Theoretical computations can contribute input into experimental determinations.

Kevin Schug delves into modern microscale liquid chromatography (LC) stationary phases.

Traveling to interesting places for conferences and hearing new ideas is certainly one of the most enjoyable aspects of a faculty position. Recently, I attended the 16th International Interdisciplinary Meeting on Bioanalysis (CECE 2019) in Gdansk, Poland. I was absolutely delighted both by the city and the scientific quality of the meeting.

In an effort to better understand the current application potential of microscale liquid chromatography (micro-LC), I picked up a few recent review articles from the literature. What one immediately appreciates from glancing through the literature for such information, is that there are a lot of different configurations and alternative formats, which can be placed under the micro-LC umbrella.

Recently, I was honored to attend the 2019 Shimadzu Global Innovation Summit, hosted by Shimadzu Corporation in Kyoto, Japan. The focus of this meeting was to highlight innovation at the interface between analytical chemistry and medicine.

As someone who has been associated very closely with poster presentations, I have to say, it is time for a change.

Exosomes are small lipid membrane-bound extracellular vesicles, on the order 30 – 150 nm in diameter, which are shed by normal and tumor cells in the body. They are circulating within your body and can be isolated from virtually any biological fluid. Exosomes released from tumor cells have been shown to be enriched in certain proteins. These nanobodies hold significant promise for the discovery of cancer biomarkers, for cancer diagnosis and prognosis, and for biomarker quantitation.

If given the need to determine drug A or its metabolite in blood, 99% of the time I would choose to start with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS).

We have been working to develop the use of liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole–mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for quantification of intact proteins from biological fluids.

As we close in on a little more than a month to go before the 43rd International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography and the 16th GCxGC Symposium (ISCC & GCxGC 2019; www.isccgcxgc.com), May 12 – 17 in Ft. Worth, Texas, my excitement burgeons. All of the groundwork has been laid to provide forums for presenting and discussing the latest advances in capillary and comprehensive separations science.

Virtually exclusively, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)-based assays for protein quantitation rely on bottom-up strategies, where the protein is initially digested into constituent peptides during sample preparation. Top-down intact protein quantitation, especially using affordable, low resolution triple quadrupole (QQQ) mass spectrometers, has been largely unexplored.

If you have a method or process that involves a number of different variables, multivariate optimization approaches can provide a faster route to optimum conditions and can lead to a more reliable outcome than using a one-factor-at-a-time approach. With a little study and practice, students and researchers can apply these optimization techniques, even if a complete understanding of the underlying statistical treatments is not immediately apparent.

In 2009, the founders of VUV Analytics, Inc. approached my group about the potential of coupling a vacuum ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy detector to a gas chromatograph (GC–VUV).

From May 12 – 17, 2019 at the Hilton Ft. Worth in Ft. Texas, I will be co-chairing (together with my colleague Prof. Dan Armstrong) the 43rd International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography (ISCC) and the 16th GCxGC Symposium. I am writing to tell you this not only because organizing a meeting is quite an undertaking, but also because I am really excited about how this event is shaping up.

The 2019 ISCC and GCxGC Symposia, May 12–17, 2019, in Fort Worth, Texas, promise to provide an exciting and relevant venue for discussions of the latest developments in chromatography.

Unconventional oil and gas (UOG) extraction is a multistep process that involves horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and massive infrastructure to handle fossil fuel resource recovery and associated wastewater generation.

For an international conference, highlighting the diversity of research, and the people performing it, is important. Diversity comes in a lot of different flavors: Industrial vs. academic; different cultures, values, needs, and resources; age and gender; among others. Representatives from all different backgrounds and experiences should be given a voice.

The drive behind multipath liquid chromatography (LC), a new concept developed by Kevin Schug and his group, is presented.

I just finished a 10-month stint as Interim Associate Dean for Research and Development in the College of Science at The University of Texas Arlington. I was afforded that opportunity when some restructuring in another college left a temporary vacancy, which I was asked to fill. I certainly considered it an honor to be asked to serve in that role, but the temporary nature of that role also piqued my interest. For me, it seemed like a chance to do an internship in administration, to see if I liked it or not. I worked with great people, I did not really like the role.

For several years, our group has been working on a concept that we have termed multipath liquid chromatography (LC). The main idea is to target multiple classes of compounds following a single injection of a sample, the components of which are segregated on-line and directed to separate appropriate paths for simultaneous separation; the streams are then recombined for detection. I believe that this approach would be powerful for biomarker quantitation, where it would be more informative to track both metabolite and protein biomarkers to better define a disease state, or in the case of antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) development, where the metabolism of the ADC might involve understanding both the levels of the released drug and the remaining protein.

If given the need to determine drug A or its metabolite in blood, 99% of the time I would choose to start with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS).

What type of mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation provides the best specificity during trace quantitative analysis from complex mixtures?

What type of mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation provides the best specificity during trace quantitative analysis from complex mixtures?

I do not remember the application, but I remember very clearly Professor McNair telling us that soil is one of the most challenging sample matrices, if not the toughest, from which to perform analytical determinations. Sources indicate the composition of soil ideal for growing plants to be 25% air, 25% water, 45% minerals, and 5% organic matter. That does not seem like a daunting makeup, but the reality is that the relative proportion of the constituents can vary dramatically.

One of the initiatives that the SCSC oversees is the nomination process and awarding of the Satinder Ahuja Award for Young Investigators in Separation Science. Where are all of the young investigators in separation science? Certainly, those that have been honored to date have been worthy; however, there must be more eligible parties out there.

I do not remember the application, but I remember very clearly Professor McNair telling us that soil is one of the most challenging sample matrices, if not the toughest, from which to perform analytical determinations. Sources indicate the composition of soil ideal for growing plants to be 25% air, 25% water, 45% minerals, and 5% organic matter. That does not seem like a daunting makeup, but the reality is that the relative proportion of the constituents can vary dramatically.