Mass spectrometry (MS) was performed using the TOF/MS mode in one run followed by a QTOF/MS run using auto MS/MS data acquisition. An electrospray ionization source in the positive and negative modes was used to ionize analytes in the extract. MS was performed using the TOF/MS mode in one run followed by a QTOF/MS run using auto MS/MS data acquisition. An electrospray ionization source in the positive and negative modes was used to ionize analytes in the extract (1).
Of the aforementioned1000 cases, 290 were positive for at least one traditional recreational drug (TRD) or NPS (29%). Of the 288 that were positive for TRDs, 15 have NPS (4.9%). There were eight unique NPS detected with an overall detection frequency of 26. Only CNS depressants were detected, including designer benzodiazepines, new synthetic opioids, and the plant-derived opioid, mitragynine. Bromazolam (detection frequency, DF = 7) was the most detected, followed by para-fluorofentanyl (DF = 4) and mitragynine (DF = 3). The five other NPS detected includes acetyl fentanyl, N-methyl norfentanyl, protonitazene, etizolam, and xylazine. In one case three NPS were detected, while in six, two NPS were detected.
All but one case also had one or more traditional recreational drugs, of which fentanyl (DF = 9), methamphetamine (DF = 9), and delta-9-THC (DF = 4) were the most detected. Cocaine was detected in two cases while the inactive cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, was detected in three cases. In nine cases, the precursor for fentanyl, ANPP, was detected. Two adulterants, quinine and lidocaine, were detected in two and three cases, respectively. The impurity obtained during methamphetamine synthesis, N,N-dimethylamphetamine, was detected in one case. Sixteen of the seventeen cases tested negative for ethanol (1).
The researchers state that, although the number of cases where NPS were found in their cohort is limited, the findings from their study provide additional evidence that NPS poses an ongoing danger to road safety, as well as emphasize the need for changes in policy to expand the NPS testing infrastructure. They believe that future research should remain focused on detecting these substances in roadway accidents, with emphasis on the drivers of the vehicles in question, as they are the element most responsible for injuries and fatalities in crashes. Furthermore, the development of a dynamic roadside testing strategy adaptable to detecting those drivers impaired by NPS in close to, if not in, real-time would be, in their opinion, most beneficial (1).
References
- Gerona, R.; Tomer, D.; Nielsen, D, et al. New Psychoactive substances in Roadway Crash Victims in California. Front. Toxicol. 2025, 7, 1572324. DOI: DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1572324
- Williams, A. F.; Peat, M.A.; Crouch, D. J. et al.. Drugs in Fatally Injured Young Male Drivers. Public Health Rep. 1985, 100 (1), 19-25.
- Budd, R. D.; Muto, J. J.; Wong, J. K. Drugs of Abuse Found in Fatally Injured Drivers in Los Angeles County. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1989, 23 (2), 153-158. DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(89)90021-5
- Rudisill, T. M.; Zhao, S.; Abate, M. A. et al. Trends in Drug Use Among Drivers Killed in U.S. Traffic Crashes, 1999-2010. Accid. Anal Prev. 2014, 70, 178-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.003
- Brady, J. E.; Li, G. Trends in Alcohol and Other Drugs Detected in Fatally Injured Drivers in the United States, 1999-2010. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 179 (6), 692-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt327