OR WAIT null SECS
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) are unique in all analytical science. The detector performs several difficult functions that make sensitive and selective analysis possible. In this instalment, we will explore the challenges involved in detecting the effluent from a capillary gas chromatographic column, and summarize the many detector options. We will then consider basic ideas and tasks that allow detectors to function properly. Finally, we will examine some specific troubleshooting and preventative maintenance tips for common detectors. We will see that, with some simple preventative thinking and action, detectors in gas chromatography can provide excellent sensitivity and selectivity for years of use.
In capillary gas chromatography (GC), the detector plays a role that is unique in all analytical science. It must be small, sensitive, and fast, with selectivity varying based on the type of detector used. First, consider the effluent that is eluted from the detector end of a typical capillary column. This effluent is a stream of vapour moving at velocities of usually more than 50 cm/s, and sometimes over 1 m/s. With a typical volumetric flow rate at the column exit of about 2 mL/min, this generates about 30 µL of carrier gas per second, which, during peak elution, contains analytes with masses usually measured in nanogram or picogram. Therefore, the detector must be of sufficiently small volume to not allow significant additional expansion of the carrier gas effluent as it leaves the column. Too large a detector volume would lead to extracolumn peak broadening, reducing both resolution and peak height. The detector must be sensitive enough to record the passage of nanogram/ picogram of vapour phase analyte dispersed in the above-mentioned 30 µL of carrier gas. Finally, the detector must have a very rapid response time, producing individual signals fast enough to generate at least 20 data points across peaks that may be 1 s or shorter in width. Therefore, small, sensitive, and fast are the three fundamental requirements for a detector.
Selectivity, the ability to discriminate between different analytes or to detect some compounds or compound classes but not others, is another critical detector characteristic. A detector may be universal, as in a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) or fullscan mass-selective detector (MSD), detecting any analyte other than the carrier gas, or it may be selective, as in a flame ionization detector (FID), which detects only carbon-containing compounds; an electron capture detector (ECD), which detects only compounds with highly electronegative functional groups; or a selected ion monitoring mass selective detector (MSD), which detects only the molar masses set by the user. Since gas chromatography is very widely used in many industries, and not just by specialized analytical chemists, detectors must also be easy to use, operate, and maintain.
Based on these characteristics, Table 1, adapted from Schug, NcNair, and Hinshaw, provides grades and a summary for several common gas chromatographic detectors (1). We can see there is often a trade-off between characteristics such as selectivity and sensitivity. More selective detectors, such as ECD, detect fewer analytes, but are more sensitive than more universal detectors, such as FID or TCD, which detect more analytes but are not as sensitive. There is another clear trade-off between sensitivity and ease of use. More sensitive detectors often require greater care, particularly to avoid contamination that may generate spurious signals or excessive noise at lower detection levels.
Finally, a detector may be concentration or mass sensitive. Among classical detectors, TCD and ECD are concentration sensitive, while FID is mass sensitive. This is a subtle difference that may not be observed until troubleshooting or optimizing, and is noticed when looking at raw peak heights and peak areas. If optimizing for speed by increasing the flow rate, we would initially think that the faster flow rate would result in faster, sharper peaks, therefore greater peak height. This is true for a mass sensitive detector; the peak height is higher, but since the total mass of analyte stays the same, the peak area is the same. For a concentration sensitive detector, the peak area may decrease, as the height is unchanged (volume of the detector is constant), but the peak area can decrease, as the peak will be sharper, with the same height. If calibrating using standards or a calibration curve, these differences may not be noticeable unless working at or near the limit of detection.
There are some common ideas for preventative maintenance and troubleshooting for all detectors. In the first American Chemical Society Short Course on capillary GC that I took in 1990, Stuart Cram of Hewlett-Packard (now Agilent Technologies) and Milos Novotny of Indiana University stated succinctly the most important truism in gas chromatography— “Capillary GC is clean GC”. Most preventative maintenance and troubleshooting revolves around keeping the detector clean and avoiding contaminants in the carrier gas stream that can either foul the detector or elevate the baseline.
On any gas chromatograph, the detector is one of three separately heated zones, along with the inlet and the column oven. Generally, the detector should be heated to a temperature above that of the highest temperature of the methods being run. It is heated for the sole purpose of keeping it clean. Also, when initially heating the detector, it is a good idea to allow it to equilibrate for a couple of hours at the set temperature prior to use. Remember that the temperature sensor is in one place, not over the whole detector.
Most detectors require a specific distance that the column must extend into the detector from the fitting inside the column oven. Unfortunately, this is a blind connection. The fitting must be installed onto the column outside the column oven and then carefully installed into the detector. When troubleshooting problems of excessive noise, small signals, no peaks, or poor peak shapes, column installation problems are often the cause. Also, ensure that the column end is properly cut. Improper column cutting leads to active sites at the column end that cause poor peak shapes, and can also cause small pieces of fused silica or polyimide coating to foul the detector, usually resulting in increased noise.
Gas purity is critical for reducing detector noise and contamination. Carrier gas contaminants can include air and water from leaks to the atmosphere or water and organic contaminants from the instrument, gas lines, or the gas cylinder itself. Ensure that you begin with high purity gases either at the point of purchase or by using appropriate gas scrubbers. Your instrument vendor can assist you with ensuring that your gas supply is highly pure. Then, ensure that the system is free of leaks. Even though the gas lines are pressurized, contaminants can back diffuse into the gas flow. Finally, ensure that your inlet and sampling devices are clean and properly maintained.
Many laboratories today have foregone classical cylinders for hydrogen generators. Although a capital expense item, significant long-term operating savings and improved safety can result. When choosing a hydrogen generator, similar to purchasing cylinders, double-check the purity of the delivered gas, along with volumetric flow and output pressure, and ensure that these are sufficient for providing fuel gas to the detector. If hydrogen carrier gas is used, ensure that the maximum capacity of the generator will provide sufficient gas flow for the inlet, especially when operating under split injection with high split ratios.
The most common evidence that the detector requires attention, cleaning, or maintenance is a change in the baseline. On my own systems, I check the baseline daily. On a modern data system, this involves starting a blank run, and then monitoring the real-time signal. The baseline should look the same as the previous day. Figure 1 shows a normal baseline and an elevated baseline with increased noise, indicating that the detector needs attention. If the rapid noise has a greater amplitude, this usually indicates some change in the environment or the electronics; perhaps another instrument is working on the same circuit as the GC system. If the overall baseline is elevated, the usual problem is contamination in one or more of the gas streams. If there is no signal at all, check that the detector is operating. Checking the baseline is one of the simplest of all tests for proper detector operation.
The FID requires three gases. The carrier gas can be helium, nitrogen, or hydrogen; in previous articles, I have advocated using nitrogen with capillary GC and temperature programming, as it is the least expensive and the most green choice (2,3). The fuel gas is hydrogen, and the oxidant is air. Take care to ensure that the fuel and oxidant gases are pure and have stable flow rates. Since hydrogen is being combusted in the detector, the product of the reaction of hydrogen and oxygen is water. Most modern FIDs include an automatic ignitor, but take care to ensure that the detector is fully heated prior to ignition, or water can form on the metal surfaces. When installing the column, take care with the insertion distance, and ensure that the column end does not contact the flame jet. If the column end is inserted too far, it can contact the flame jet and ignite, causing excessive noise and possible loss of signal. If not inserted far enough, the void space may cause peak broadening, or there may be a gas leak.
MSDs provide both qualitative and quantitative data, and have become straightforward to operate. Daily tuning or optimization are important when operating an MSD, as the ion source changes over time as samples are run and eventually contaminate metal surfaces and lenses inside the source. In a previous article, we discussed a wealth of information obtainable from the tune report (4). The simplest measures of whether the ion source needs maintenance are the electron multiplier voltage and the peak resolution between the main and isotope peaks from the tuning compounds. Increasing electron multiplier voltage or loss of resolution between the adjacent mass isotope peaks are a strong indication that the ion source requires cleaning.
ECD is among the most sensitive and selective of all detectors. As seen in Table 1, it gets the highest grade for sensitivity, but the lowest for qualitative speciation, as it is very selective for a subset of electronegative species. It also has the lowest grade for robustness because it is easily contaminated, even by the room air. ECD was reviewed in a recent column, including a discussion that many originally felt that it would not be a useful detector because it is so easily contaminated (5). Users should ensure that the carrier and makeup gases are of the highest purity and extremely dry. The laboratory environment must also be contaminant-free; I have witnessed elevated baseline on an ECD in the presence of cigarette smoke residue on the operator’s clothing.
In gas chromatography, the detector is the third critical heated zone on the instrument. The overriding consideration for ensuring long-term effective operation is cleanliness and preventing contamination. Some considerations, such as ensuring pure carrier and detector gases, sufficient heating and temperature equilibration, and proper column installation are common to all detectors. Beyond these, each detector has its own operating and maintenance principles. With simple preventative maintenance and care for the entire system, from gas sources to detector, detectors for gas chromatography are sensitive, selective, and rugged.
(1) Schug, K. A.; McNair, H. M.; Hinshaw, J. V. GC Detectors: From Thermal Conductivity to Vacuum Ultraviolet Absorption. LCGC Eur. 2015, 28 (1), 45–50.
(2) McCann, S. P.; Rana, H.; Handzo, B. A.; Snow, N. H. Go With the Flow: Thinking About Carrier Gas Flow in GC. LCGC Eur. 2020, 33 (3), 127–134.
(3) Snow, N. H. Green Chemistry: What Is It (and What Is It Not)? And How Does It Apply to Gas Chromatography? LCGC Eur. 2023, 36 (5), 169–173. DOI: 10.56530/lcgc.na.az3979e4
(4) Snow, N. H. Stopping GC and GC–MS Problems Before They Start. LCGC Eur. 2019, 32 (1), 22–27.
(5) Snow, N. H. Selectivity and Sensitivity: The Electron Capture Detector (ECD), Its Unique Inventor James Lovelock (1919–2022), and GAIA. LCGC Eur. 2022, 35 (10), 454–458. DOI: 10.56530/lcgc.na.dm6277r4