What is the best way to clean protein residues from a bonded-silica reversed-phase column?
The answer to the following question was provided by LCGC’s “Column Watch” editor Ron Majors.
Q: What is the best way to clean protein residues from a bonded-silica reversed-phase column?
A: If biological materials such as plasma or serum build up on a reversed-phase column, chromatographers must use a somewhat different cleaning process. In most instances, neat organic solvents such as acetonitrile or methanol do not dissolve peptides and proteins and are ineffective for cleaning reversed-phase columns. However, mixtures of organic solvents with buffer, acids and, sometimes, ion-pairing reagents can be effective. Initially, flushing a column with mobile phase that has a somewhat higher percentage of the stronger solvent (solvent B) should be attempted.
Freiser and coworkers (1) found that repeated up-and-down gradients between aqueous trifluoroacetic acid and trifluoroacetic acid–propanol can regenerate contaminated reversed-phase columns. Bhadwaj and Day (2) suggested that a plug injection of 100 μL of trifluoroethanol in a 250 mm X 4.6 mm column could work. If these procedures fail, the strong eluents or solubilizing agents recommended by Cunico and colleagues (3) can be used to strip proteins (see Table I). Before flushing columns with these solvents, however, consult the column manual or the manufacturer to ensure that these solvents are compatible with the packing material. Silica-based columns are usually compatible but organic polymer–based columns can swell or shrink with certain solvent combinations, and the performance could be affected.
As with the previous solvent series, ensure that the sets of solvents in Table I used in series are miscible. Propanol is a good intermediate flush solvent. A minimum of 20 column volumes should be used for each solvent system. Because some of the solvent systems are quite viscous, the flushing flow-rates should be adjusted accordingly to ensure that no overpressuring occurs. After cleaning a column with the guanidine or urea reagents, use a minimum of 40–50 column volumes of HPLC-grade water to flush the column.
For reversed-phase columns, it has been inadvisable to use detergents such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Triton, because these compounds are apparently adsorbed strongly on bonded-silica packing and are difficult to remove. Using detergents can affect the surface of the packing and change its characteristics. However, a study by the Separations Group found that a column contaminated by a protecting group and scavenger products from a peptide synthesis could be cleaned by injecting 500 μL of 1% SDS solution into the mobile phase flowing at 1 mL/min (4). If followed by a gradient from 5% to 95% acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid and equilibration at the starting conditions, the polypeptide separation was restored.
(1) H.H. Freiser et al., “The Use of Stabilized Silica Support with a Short Alkyl Chain for Reversed-Phase Preparative Chromatography of Proteins,” product bulletin number 10, Micra Scientific (Northbrook, Illinois, 1988).
(2) S. Bhardwaj and R.A. Day, LCGC 17(4), 354–356 (1997).
(3) R.L. Cunico, K.M. Gooding and T. Wehr “Basic HPLC and CE of Biomolecules,” Bay Bioanalytical Laboratory (Richmond, California, 1998), p. 254.
(4) “Reversed-Phase Column Cleaning: SDS is OK,” Vydac Advances, Grace/Vydac (The Separations Group) (Hesperia, California, Winter 1998).
If you have a question you'd like answered, please submit them at Ask LCGC. We look forward to hearing from you!
Measuring Procyanidin Concentration in Wines Using UHPLC
January 24th 2025Researchers from the University of Bordeaux (Villenave d'Ornon, France) report the development and validation of a rapid and quantitative analytical method measuring crown procyanidin concentration in red and white wines using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with a ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer.
The Next Frontier for Mass Spectrometry: Maximizing Ion Utilization
January 20th 2025In this podcast, Daniel DeBord, CTO of MOBILion Systems, describes a new high resolution mass spectrometry approach that promises to increase speed and sensitivity in omics applications. MOBILion recently introduced the PAMAF mode of operation, which stands for parallel accumulation with mobility aligned fragmentation. It substantially increases the fraction of ions used for mass spectrometry analysis by replacing the functionality of the quadrupole with high resolution ion mobility. Listen to learn more about this exciting new development.
The Complexity of Oligonucleotide Separations
January 9th 2025Peter Pellegrinelli, Applications Specialist at Advanced Materials Technology (AMT) explains the complexity of oligonucleotide separations due to the unique chemical properties of these molecules. Issues such as varying length, sequence complexity, and hydrophilic-hydrophobic characteristics make efficient separations difficult. Separation scientists are addressing these challenges by modifying mobile phase compositions, using varying ion-pairing reagents, and exploring alternative separation modes like HILIC and ion-exchange chromatography. Due to these complexities, AMT has introduced the HALO® OLIGO column, which offers high-resolution, fast separations through its innovative Fused-Core® technology and high pH stability. Alongside explaining the new column, Peter looks to the future of these separations and what is next to come.
Testing Solutions for Metals and PFAS in Water
January 22nd 2025When it comes to water analysis, it can be challenging for labs to keep up with ever-changing testing regulations while also executing time-efficient, accurate, and risk-mitigating workflows. To ensure the safety of our water, there are a host of national and international regulators such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), World Health Organization (WHO), and the European Union (EU) that demand stringent testing methods for drinking water and wastewater. Those methods often call for fast implementation and lengthy processes, as well as high sensitivity and reliable instrumentation. This paper explains how your ICP-MS, ICP-OES, and LC-MS-MS workflows can be optimized for compliance with the latest requirements for water testing set by regulations like US EPA methods 200.8, 6010, 6020, and 537.1, along with ISO 17294-2. It will discuss the challenges faced by regulatory labs to meet requirements and present field-proven tips and tricks for simplified implementation and maximized uptime.