OR WAIT 15 SECS
Volume 11, Issue 17
Finding Time for Thinking Time
Someone asked me the other day how much thinking time I factored into my work. I didn’t really consider my response, automatically commenting that it would be a luxury to have any thinking time at all - either inside work or outside of it!
The person who asked this question was older than me, perhaps by a generation. I have noticed that he takes time to read the newspaper (physical not electronic) over breakfast and is often more quiet in meetings than others. After giving his question some more thought (in the little thinking time I have), I asked why he had asked. He replied: “You always look so busy and achieve a lot, but you must build in thinking time if you really want to innovate or solve deep problems.” Sounds very Zen right? A little “Management Speak”? His comments have been playing away in the back of my mind for weeks and I’ve concluded that he may well have a very good point. I see laboratory managers and analytical staff rushing all the time. Rushing to do all of the things that, if you are reading this piece, you should be doing instead of reading this piece. You will all have a long list of those. It hasn’t always been like this. I can remember the days when the following were seen as acceptable and not “slacking” or “luxury” time:
I freely admit that if I see people in our laboratory environment doing some of the activities above, I do question if they have enough work to keep them busy. What a crazy situation.
I asked my learned older colleague if he thought this change was because all the intellectual challenges within our branch of science have been solved and that we were now effectively operating a commoditized service where productivity far outweighs creativity. His sage reply was: “Only if you predict doing no more method development and require no future budget for instruments with better capabilities.” I absolutely refute that we are at the end of the development line for chromatography as a science or that we have no new challenges to face. I absolutely believe that we need to have thinking time built into our schedules. The question is what is the best way to do this and what are the benefits given the pace of life, the immediacy of information, and the demands of the modern life (in and out of the laboratory). I’m proposing a creativity experiment in my laboratory, and I’d like readers of this column to do the same. I’m ring-fencing two hours per week in my schedule and those of my staff for “thinking time”. I know what you’re thinking:
I know because these are some of my colleague’s replies when I suggested this was going to happen. However, we are all so “compressed” these days, engaged in the production of data and firefighting that we don’t see that there are better ways to do things, which, if adopted and developed, would help us to make more time. I’m in no way a psychology major, but believe me the internet is full of useful tricks and tips on developing your creative, critical, and analytical thinking skills and I’ve spent a little time researching how best to use my thinking time. Here are some of the takeâhome’s from my research that I’m going to try and use to develop this new approach:
I think I know how you are feeling just now. The points above make you feel a little uneasy. They seem a little pointless, at the very least you struggle to see just what you need to do, or the suggestions seem impenetrable or irrelevant. I get it. We are scientists and all of this “creative” stuff doesn’t sit easily with us. But that’s the point of this experiment. To take us out of the usual and comfortable and deposit us in a place that fosters better thinking. I know I’m going to hate my first session because I don’t have a clearly defined idea of what needs to be done, or the expected outcomes. There isn’t a logical path through the session. However, if it allows me to be more strategic, innovative, or effective then it’s worth a try. I’ll report back in a future column how things are going and would welcome input from any readers who might also decide to overcome their fear of the creative!
Contact author: Incognito