LCGC UST
|Articles|December 1, 2018

The Application Notebook

  • The Application Notebook-12-01-2018
  • Volume 36
  • Issue 12

Optimization of Sample Preparation for Pesticide Analysis in Oil-Based Cannabis Products Using LipiFiltr®

This application note outlines the performance benefits achieved with UCT’s LipiFiltr® cleanup cartridge for the analysis of pesticides in oil-based cannabis products using LC–MS/MS analysis.

This application note outlines the performance benefits achieved with UCT’s LipiFiltr® cleanup cartridge for the analysis of pesticides in oil-based cannabis products using LC–MS/MS analysis. The pesticides evaluated in this study include those listed in the Oregon monitoring list (≈60 pesticides). Cannabidiol (CBD) oil was used as the representative matrix. A comparison of pre- and post-LipiFiltr® cleanup using full scan GC–MS is also presented to demonstrate the removal of lipid co-extractives, without compromising cannabinoid content.

Procedure

Sample Extraction

  • Weigh 1 g of sample into a 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube.

  • Add internal standard(s).

  • Add 10 mL of extraction solvent (90:5:5 [v/v] acetonitrile–

  • water–toluene).

  • Shake or vortex the sample for 1 h.

  • Centrifuge the sample at ≥ 1500 rcf for 5 min.

  • Pass 1.5 mL supernatant through a LipiFiltr® cartridge and collect the purified extract in an autosampler vial.

Instrumental

Pesticide Recovery

LC–MS/MS: SCIEX Triple Quad 6500 with SCIEX V Method™ for pesticides in cannabis    

Co-extractives Removal

GC–MS: 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25-µm Rxi-5Sil MS column with a Topaz Precision split inlet liner. A 1 µL injection volume with a split ratio of 10:1 was used.

Results and Conclusion

Pesticides

  • Most compounds were found to have a recovery value in the range of 70–120%.

  • A few polar compounds, such as acephate, exhibited low but reproducible (<10% RSD) recovery.

  • Increasing the polarity of the extraction solvent or using a suitable isotopically labelled internal standard could be used to correct any discrepancy in recovery.

Co-extractives Removal

GC–MS (full scan) analysis showed significant removal of lipids and other high-molecular-weight matrix co-extractives using the LipiFiltr® cartridge, with no significant negative effect on CBD. This was backed up by LC–DAD analysis (not detailed here). While further work should be completed on other oil-based products, including those with a high THC content, the results highlighted here demonstrate that the LipiFiltr® cartridge can be successfully used to remove matrix co-extractives from oil-based cannabis samples without compromising CBD content or pesticide recoveries.

UCT, LLC
2731 Bartram Rd, Bristol, Pennsylvania 19007 USA
Tel: (800) 385 3153
Email:methods@unitedchem.comWebsite:www.unitedchem.com

 


Related to this article

Best of the Week: From Olive Waste to mRNA Vaccines
This week's Chromatography Online highlights include olive waste antioxidant recovery, food and tea analysis, EV isolation, mRNA vaccine purification, perfusion chromatography for oligonucleotides, mass spectrometry in teaching and career advice from “Women in Chromatography.”