Pittcon 2024: Identifying PFAS in Anti-Fog Products Using GC-TOFMS
On February 25, at Pittcon 2024 in San Diego, California, David Alonso of LECO Corporation led a workshop about how gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS) can be used to identify polyfluorinated alkyl chemicals (PFAS) chemicals in anti-fog product solutions.
doctor in protective suit holding test tubes while wiping desk in laboratory. | Image Credit: © LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS - stock.adobe.com
Goggles and safety glasses are prone to fogging when working in the laboratory, especially when combined with protective masks. To combat this, scientists have been using have been using eyewear with anti-fog properties, as well as anti-fog sprays and clothes to improve visibility. However, according to recent studies, these sprays and cloths run the risk of containing high levels of PFAS and other dangerous chemicals, some of which are linked to diseases like cancer. As such, anti-fog solutions must be properly characterized to identify the presence of dangerous chemicals.
A recent study by David Alonso of LECO Corporation was done to characterize anti-fog solution compounds using GC-TOFMS. This proved notable, since according to the scientists, most anti-fog constituents are not listed in commercially available mass spectral databases. To identify unknowns, enhanced chromatography and high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-HRTOFMS) were used. GCxGC-HRTOFMS allowed enhanced chromatographic resolution and helped them determine chemical formulas using accurate mass measurements for different ions. Combined with the high selectivity and accurate measurements of HR-TOFMS, these approaches to chromatographic resolution can lead to accurate and effective anti-fog component annotation.
Reference
(1) Identifying PFAS Chemicals in Consumer Anti-fog Product Solutions Using GC-TOFMS. Pittcon and The Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, Inc. 2024. https://labscievents.pittcon.org/event/pittcon-2024/planning/UGxhbm5pbmdfMTc0OTM1NA== (accessed 2024-2-20)
Detangling the Complex Web of GC×GC Method Development to Support New Users
September 12th 2024The introduction of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) to the sample screening toolbox has substantially increased the ability to comprehensively characterize complex mixtures. However, for many gas chromatography (GC) users, the thought of having to learn to develop methods on a new technology is daunting. Developing a basic GC×GC method for most (nonspecialized) applications can be accomplished in minimal time and effort given parameter suggestions and ranges to target analytes in a sample of interest. In this article, the authors work describe a simple workflow to develop a GC×GC method for a specific sample upon initial use, with the aim of decreasing the time to accomplish functional workflows for new users.
Reliable Separation and Efficient Group-type Quantitation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs)
September 11th 2024Petroleum contamination from leaking underground storage tanks, for example, is a significant concern for both the environment and human health. Thorough characterization of the contamination is required to form appropriate risk assessments and remediation strategies, but until now, the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in soil has typically involved a convoluted and labour-intensive process. In this article, the analysis of TPH in environmental media is simplified using flow-modulated GC×GC–FID with quantitation based on pre-defined compound groupings. This approach overcomes the drawbacks of conventional solvent fractionation approaches, by eliminating the need for sample fractionation and automating data processing workflows.
The Reality Behind Column Insertion Distance
September 10th 2024Column insertion distance is critical to good chromatography. What happens if the column is installed too low in the injection port? Is insertion distance more important when performing split injection or splitless injection? Does the position of the column in the injection port impact reproducibility?
