Some practical insights into optimizing LC–MS eluents and parameters to avoid signal suppression.
The following "Ask the Expert" question regarding the suppression of MS signals got the CHROMacademy team thinking. Therefore, we have put together some information on the causes of signal suppression in LC–MS and how to avoid it.
Members Question:
What is the best alternative to use instead of TFA (0.1%) which suppress MS signal? Analyte: Peptide.
Expert:
You could try 0.1% formic acid. Making any change to the acid will likely affect the retention of the peptide.
Member:
I have tried with 0.1% formic acid but I obtained very bad results with important peaks tailing. Does HFBA (heptafluorobutyric acid) suppress the signal less than TFA?
Expert:
Any compounds with ion pairing ability are likely to suppress signal in ESI, but this effect is compound dependent. All you can do is give the HFBA a try and see if it gives you an acceptable signal.
Alternatives would be to continue to use TFA, but try negative ion ESI. Positive ion APCI is also a possibility, but you won't get multiple charging so it depends on the mass of your compound vs. the maximum mass for your instrument. Have you tried manually tuning the instrument to see if this improves sensitivity?
If neither of these are options, then you'd need to consider redeveloping your chromatographic conditions using formic.
The complete article is available to CHROMacademy Lite and Premier members here >>
CHROMacademy Lite Membership is FREE and it only takes two minutes to register.
With a Lite Membership you are given access to:
∙ This month's webcast & tutorial
∙ Selected eLearning modules
∙ Featured CHROMacademy Content
∙ The CHROMacademy forum
Test drive CHROMacademy and Check out more great content available FREE to our Lite members »
New Study Examines PFAS in Breast Milk Using LC-MS/MS
November 5th 2024On the suggestion that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) affect both lactation and the human metabolome, perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were measured in the milk of 425 participants from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
AI and GenAI Applications to Help Optimize Purification and Yield of Antibodies From Plasma
October 31st 2024Deriving antibodies from plasma products involves several steps, typically starting from the collection of plasma and ending with the purification of the desired antibodies. These are: plasma collection; plasma pooling; fractionation; antibody purification; concentration and formulation; quality control; and packaging and storage. This process results in a purified antibody product that can be used for therapeutic purposes, diagnostic tests, or research. Each step is critical to ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of the final product. Applications of AI/GenAI in many of these steps can significantly help in the optimization of purification and yield of the desired antibodies. Some specific use-cases are: selecting and optimizing plasma units for optimized plasma pooling; GenAI solution for enterprise search on internal knowledge portal; analysing and optimizing production batch profitability, inventory, yields; monitoring production batch key performance indicators for outlier identification; monitoring production equipment to predict maintenance events; and reducing quality control laboratory testing turnaround time.