News|Articles|March 31, 2026

Streamlined LC-MS/MS Method for Screening Unauthorized Synthetic Dyes in Children's Foods

Author(s)John Chasse

Following 2025 FDA initiatives to ensure the safety of children's foods, researchers developed a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to detect eight prohibited acidic and basic synthetic dyes in candies and cereals. Although no unauthorized dyes were found in the analyzed samples, the study demonstrates that robust, routine analytical screening is essential to verify labeling accuracy, maintain regulatory compliance, and protect vulnerable populations.

It is imperative that effective analytical methods are in place for the assessment of risks posed by synthetic dyes in food products, especially those that are marketed to children, who represent a vulnerable population. These dyes include a variety of chromophore classes and exhibit variable acidic and basic properties which make their extraction from complex food matrices difficult, as well as increase the likelihood of undetected contaminants. Researchers at the University of Central Florida (Orlando) applied a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the screening of unauthorized acidic and basic dyes in hard candies and breakfast cereals-categories associated with high consumption among children. A paper based on their efforts was published in Food Chemistry.1

In 2025, the FDA reasserted their previous efforts to regulate synthetic food dyes by focusing on creating clearer rules and ensuring the safety of foods made for babies and young children.2 While many analytical methods has been used to investigate the presence of approved food dyes in candy and cereal samples,3-6 only a limited number of studies in comparison have done the same for unauthorized dyes,7-13 an observation by the research team which inspired their study.

Target analytes for this study included Basic Red 1, Basic Red 2, Basic Red 9, Solvent Red 23, Acid Violet 17, Acid Yellow 3, Acid Red 151, and Red 40. “These eight dyes,” write the authors of the study,1 “represent a deliberately diverse set chosen for their complementary chemical structures, charge types, solubility behaviors, and spectral properties. Together, they cover the major dye classes (cationic, anionic, and non-ionic) and span a wide range of chromophores (azo, triphenylmethane, and solvent dyes). Their range of ionic states and solvent affinities makes the group suitable for studying dye interactions across multiple environments, including biological, textile, environmental, and polymer systems. Additionally, these dyes are commercially available, well-characterized, and chemically stable, which supports reproducibility and standardization in laboratory or industrial applications. Overall, the set provides a compact, yet comprehensive representation of the behaviors seen across the broader landscape of synthetic colorants.”1

“This study,” the authors continued,1 “leverages the high selectivity of tandem mass spectrometry to facilitate the extraction and chromatographic separation of both acidic and basic dye classes. The methodology employed is notably streamlined, minimizing matrix interference and enabling robust quantification. Analytical performance metrics— including sensitivity, specificity, detection limits and recoveries — were excellent across all targeted analytes. Given that all dyes investigated are explicitly banned by the FDA, achieving detection thresholds in the sub-parts-per-billion range is critical for effective surveillance. Although none of the prohibited dyes were detected in the analyzed food samples, discrepancies in product labeling underscore the necessity for routine analytical screening, particularly in high-risk categories such as confectionery and breakfast cereals.”

The research team believes that their findings “highlight a broader issue of labeling transparency and accuracy, suggesting that current packaging practices may not reliably reflect the true composition of food products. Continued monitoring and method refinement are essential to ensure consumer safety and regulatory compliance.”1

Read More on Similar Topics
Improved Aroma Profiling of Foods by High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction

References

  1. Nauth, S. D.; Hitt, B.; Campiglia, A. D. LC-MS/MS Method for Detecting Eight Unauthorized Synthetic Dyes in Confectionery and Breakfast Cereals. Food Chem. 2026, 512, 148876. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2026.148876
  2. HHS, FDA to Phase Out Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes in the Nation's Food Supply. FDA website 2025. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/hhs-fda-phase-out-petroleum-based-synthetic-dyes-nations-food-supply
  3. Bisgin, A. T. Selective Separation and Determination Strategy for Monitoring E100, E127, E129, and E133 in Foodstuff: Vortex-Assisted Sequential-Simultaneous Liquid-Phase Microextraction. Microchem. J.2024, 196, 109716. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.109716
  4. Carrera, L.; Serraïma, D.; Bagán, H. Determination of Dyes in Candies in an Analytical Chemistry Laboratory Subject. JOTSE2025, 15 (2), 614-622. DOI: 10.3926/jotse.3147
  5. Hameed, E. A. A.; Abd-ElHamid, G. H.; El-Darder, O. M. et al. Fast, Sensitive, and Accurate Analysis of the Most Common Synthetic Food Colorants in 65 Egyptian Commercial Products Using New HPLC-DAD and UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Methods. Food Anal. Meth. 2022, 15, 3444-3457. DOI: 10.1007/s12161-022-02370-8
  6. Stevens, L. J.; Burgess, J. R.; Stochelski, M. A. et al. Amounts of Artificial Food Dyes and Added Sugars in Foods and Sweets Commonly Consumed by Children. Clin. Pediatr.2014, 54 (4), 309-321. DOI: 10.1177/0009922814530803
  7. Ragab, M.; Omar, K.; Fawzy, E. et al. Ultra-Fast LC-MS/MS Method for the Identification and Prevalence of Rhodamine B in Candies Commonly Consumed by Children in Egypt. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem.2025, 105 (20), 9396-9413. DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2025.2501752
  8. Dixit, S.; Purshottam, S.; Khanna, S. et al. Usage Pattern of Synthetic Food Colours in Different States of India and Exposure Assessment Through Commodities Preferentially Consumed by Children. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2011, 28 (8), 996-1005. DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2011.580011
  9. Vachirapatama, N.; Mahajaroensiri, J.; Visessanguan, W. Identification and Determination of Seven Synthetic Dyes in Foodstuff and Soft Drinks on Monolithic C18 Column by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Food Drug Anal.2008, 16 (5), 77-82. DOI: 10.38212/2224-6614.2323
  10. Rahnama, H.; Mazloomi, S. M.; Berizi, E. et al. Identification of Tartrazine Adulteration and Evaluating Exposure to Synthetic Dyes of Sunset Yellow and Quinoline Yellow Through Consumption of Food Products Among Children. FSN2022, 10 (11), 3781-3788. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2975
  11. Lhotská, I.; Solich, P.; Šatínský, D. A Comparative Study of Advanced Stationary Phases for Fast Liquid Chromatography Separation of Synthetic Food Colorants. Molecules2018, 23 (12), 3335. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123335
  12. G. Alruwaili, G.; H.M. Ali, H. M.; T.A.S. Elnasr, T. A. S. et al. New Method Based on Solid-Phase Extraction and Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Fluorescence Detector for Trace Level Detection of Safranin and Rhodamine B Dyes in Kids’ Candies. J. Food Comp. Anal.2025, 145, 107800. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107800
  13. Lim, H. S.; Choi, E.; Lee, J. H. et al. Analysis of Illegal Colourants (Citrus Red II, Diethyl Yellow, Dimethyl Yellow, Metanil Yellow and Rhodamine B) in Foods by LC-UV and LC–MS/MS. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2020, 37 (6), 895-904. DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2020.1746840