In ion chromatography, the presence of a large amount of matrix ions makes quantification of the target ions difficult.
Bernard G. Sheldon1 , Rida Al-Horr2 , and Rosanne Slingsby1 , 1 Dionex Corporation, 2 Dow Chemical
In ion chromatography, the presence of a large amount of matrix ions makes quantification of the target ions difficult. Selective removal of matrix ions–matrix elimination–can be performed by treating a sample with a solid-phase extractant. Halides can be removed by precipitation with silver, which is present as a counterion in a cation-exchange resin. A subsequent treatment with a cation-trapping column removes residual dissolved silver ions.
When analyzing a sample for nitrite, it is important to maintain a high pH to preclude oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, which occurs readily at low pH. Therefore, sodium ion (Na+ ) should be used as the counterion on the silver-trapping column.
Solid-phase manual extraction columns, such as OnGuard® II cartridges are useful for processing a limited number of samples; they are discarded after use with a single sample. Newly introduced InGuard™ cartridges provide automated inline matrix elimination capabilities, which reduce sample-processing costs, increase processing reliability, and enhance ease-of-method documentation and transfer.
InGuard cartridges are used in an ion chromatograph to treat samples before they are injected. The sample is metered with a sample loop and transferred to a concentrator column after being passed through the InGuard cartridge or cartridges. While InGuard cartridges have capacities similar to their OnGuard analogues, the InGuard cartridges will only be exposed to a small amount of sample per injection, and therefore can be used many times before they are exhausted.
A Dionex ICS-3000 system with a DP dual pumping system and a Detector Compartment equipped with two 6-port valves was used here.
The first valve was a standard high-pressure 6-port injection valve equipped with a 100 µL sample loop. The second valve was a 6-port high-pressure valve installed on the Automation Manager of the DC. An InGuard Ag and an InGuard Na cartridge were plumbed in series between the two valves. The second pump transferred the sample from the sample loop through the cartridges and onto a concentrator column (Figure 1).
The passage of the sample through the InGuard cartridges may cause some dilution and band-broadening of the sample. A concentrator column traps and concentrates the sample into a small volume before injection onto the analytical column.
Figure 1
This application demonstrates the utility of a fully automated method with new InGuard Ag and Na inline matrix elimination cartridges for removal of chloride from a sample before injection. If not removed, a 1.6% sodium chloride sample, as the one being analyzed, would overwhelm the capacity of the analytical column used. The result would be an offscale peak with no resolution of the analytes of interest (Figure 2).
Figure 2
InGuard Ag cartridges contain approximately 5 mEq of silver ion, which is sufficient to remove the chloride from approximately 100 injections of 100 µL each of a 1.6% sodium chloride solution.
OnGuard, IonPac, and ASRS are registered trademarks and InGuard is a trademark of Dionex Corporation.
Dionex Corporation
1228 Titan Way, P.O. Box 3603, Sunnyvale, CA
tel. (408)737-0700; fax (408)730-9403
Website: www.dionex.com
Simplifying the GC Laboratory for Improved Efficiency
December 9th 2024Laboratories continually work to increase the capacity of their equipment, improve turnaround times and gain confident and detailed insights without generating additional burden on their operators. Discover how adopting the simplification strategy of Industry 4.0 with the GC 2400™ Platform can enhance GC workflows to increase efficiency, data quality, and business sustainability
How to Enable Sustainable GC Lab Operations
December 9th 2024Sustainability strategies are being integrated into a growing number of businesses and their operations. Laboratories are no exception. Although the necessity to reduce the environmental impact of laboratory operations is recognized, it cannot be disengaged from the economic viability of labs. This article shares ways in which laboratories can improve both their business and environmental sustainability and discusses how the GC 2400™ Platform is helping laboratories flourish in these areas
What Are the Key Features of a Smart and Connected GC Lab?
December 9th 2024The potential of smart technologies has evolved into a operational necessity - businesses were faced with the need for remote and automated operations bringing substantial improvements in productivity, efficiency, and operating costs.
Automated PFAS Extraction from Difficult Food and Food Packaging Samples
December 6th 2024More and more regulations regarding PFAS are being implemented with action limits that continue to decrease. Having a harmonized method to accurately determine the PFAS content in food, as well as other matrices, is important to ensuring long-term detection and regulation. The solvent extraction of PFAS from these varied sample matrices can be challenging given the susceptibility to contamination and the low levels in which these compounds are present. This poster, presented at RAFA 2024, examines the PFAS extraction several different food samples as well as food packing matrices.
Extraction of 40 PFAS Compounds from Soil and Tissue
December 6th 2024PFAS have been shown to cause health issues in humans, which means monitoring environmental solid samples, such as soil and tissue, is critical. This application note details the extraction of 40 spiked PFAS compounds from soil and tissue following EPA Method 1633. The automated extraction was less than 10 minutes per sample and yielded acceptable recoveries and RSDs without carryover in the system. The EDGE PFAS is an ideal option for laboratories that want to automate their PFAS extractions of solid samples.