Researchers have evaluated three different miniaturized liquid chromatography (LC) instruments for the analysis of caffeine in dietary supplements (1).
The range of dietary supplements available to consumers has exploded in recent years, with sellers purporting a broad spectrum of properties such as anti-ageing, stimulating, fat-burning, and various other health‑related benefits, with new formulations being developed regularly. Botanical species are of particular concern because of their perceived safety to many consumers and the fact they fall under the category of food as they are derived from plants. As such, the regulations for their preparation, distribution, and labelling are not as strict as those established for pharmaceutical products. Unlike pharmaceuticals, the amount of active ingredients within these products may not be specified. One of the more prominent components in these types of products is caffeine. A potent central nervous system stimulant with many effects on the body’s metabolism and naturally present in plants such as coffee or tea, the amount of caffeine in the raw product can vary widely. The consequence of which being that even if the amount of botanical species used is specified, the accurate amount of caffeine in the final product is unknown.
There are several different risks associated with high intake of caffeine, and an increasing demand for analytical methods that can evaluate the quality, effectiveness, and safety of dietary supplements and their caffeine content. Unfortunately, many of the reported methods for the study of such supplements employ sophisticated instrumentation that may not be suitable for routine tests. Therefore, researchers aimed to develop a simple and rapid method that could facilitate better control for dietary supplements.
The study focused on three miniaturized LC instruments: a benchtop capillary LC (capLC) system, a benchtop nano LC (nanoLC) system, and a portable LC system, evaluating and comparing them for the analysis of caffeine in dietary supplements.
Commercial products derived from different sources of caffeine were analyzed and researchers found that methods based on benchtop systems were superior in terms of sensitivity; however, the portable LC-based method was superior in terms of simplicity and throughput, with a total analysis time of below 15 min. Utilizing the obtained results, researchers developed a new method for the rapid measurement of caffeine in dietary supplements by portable miniaturized LC. The method provided good linearity within the 1–20 μg/mL interval, and it allowed the quantification of caffeine even in products derived from decaffeinated green coffee extracts. The researchers believe the proposed portable LC-based method can be used as a simple and rapid alternative to estimate the quality, effectiveness, and safety of dietary supplements, with regards to their caffeine content.—L.B.
References
Modern HPLC Strategies: Improving Retention and Peak Shape for Basic Analytes
August 16th 2024In high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), it is common for bases and unreacted ionized silanols on silica-based columns to cause irreproducible retention, broad peaks, and peak tailing when working with basic analytes. David S. Bell, Lead Consultant at ASKkPrime LLC offers innovative HPLC strategies that can help mitigate such issues.
Reliable Separation and Efficient Group-type Quantitation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs)
September 11th 2024Petroleum contamination from leaking underground storage tanks, for example, is a significant concern for both the environment and human health. Thorough characterization of the contamination is required to form appropriate risk assessments and remediation strategies, but until now, the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in soil has typically involved a convoluted and labour-intensive process. In this article, the analysis of TPH in environmental media is simplified using flow-modulated GC×GC–FID with quantitation based on pre-defined compound groupings. This approach overcomes the drawbacks of conventional solvent fractionation approaches, by eliminating the need for sample fractionation and automating data processing workflows.
The Reality Behind Column Insertion Distance
September 10th 2024Column insertion distance is critical to good chromatography. What happens if the column is installed too low in the injection port? Is insertion distance more important when performing split injection or splitless injection? Does the position of the column in the injection port impact reproducibility?