Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and ion chromatography profile wasabi and mustard heat and acidity.
|Webcasts|February 28, 2020
Mobile-Phase Selection for Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Methods: What You Need to Know
Author(s)Phenomenex, Inc.
In the effort to further Phenomenex's support of the analytical community join us for a free webcast focused on mobile phase selection and selectivity considerations for reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Live: Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2019 at 11am EDT | 8am PDT | 4pm BST | 5pm CEST On demand available after final airing Feb. 28, 2021 Register free
Register free:
Event Overview:
In this webcast, we will review reversed-phase mobile phase systems and their relationship to method performance regarding reversed-phase liquid chromatography. We will discuss chromatographic examples of the effects of mobile phase additives, different buffer systems, pH, and a comparison of different organic solvent on reversed-phase methods, and how to make the right choice for your separation.
Key Learning Objectives:
- Mobile phase systems for reversed-phase liquid chromatography
- Impact of the mobile phase on chromatographic resolution
- Considerations for mobile phase selection
- Selectivity and fluidic considerations
Speaker: Dr. Jason Anspach, Global Product Manager, HPLC, Phenomenex
Time and Date: Friday, Feb. 28, 2020 at 11am EST | 8am PST | 4pm GMT | 5pm CET
On demand available after final airing Feb. 28, 2021
Sponsor: Phenonomex
Register free:
Related to this article
How feasible is it to integrate this Bayesian graph-theory methodology into existing commercial chromatography software workflows for semi-automated data curation in routine analytical laboratories?
Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) show frequent milking alters cobra venom toxin makeup.
Gabriel Vivó-Truyols outlines the benefits and challenges of combining graph theory with Bayesian statistics to automate peak assignment and alignment.
This week, Chromatography Online’s coverage spanned lipidomics-based early cancer detection, career paths in separation science, machine learning and uncertainty-driven approaches to LC method development, new EU wastewater rules for pharmaceutical micropollutants, automated Separation Quality Factor (SQF) evaluation in chromatography data systems, and solutions to GLP-1 peptide analysis challenges.
Gabriel Vivó-Truyols from the Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Madrid, Spain. discusses his work on using graph theory and Bayesian statistics for peak assignment and chromatographic alignment.
Gas chromatography (GC) analysis ties prenatal mindfulness to shifts in placental fatty acids.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC–qTOF–MS) reveal metabolic shifts in tricuspid regurgitation.
Trending on LCGC International
1
GLP-1 Peptide Analysis: Challenges and Solutions
2
HPLC–DAD Method Tracks Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Stability
3
Industry Roundup: Waters Posts Strong Third Quarter as LC–MS and Chromatography Consumables Drive Growth, Acquires Ion Mobility Pioneer MOBILion
4
LC–MS/MS Dried Blood Spot Test for Galactosemia
5