An excerpt from LCGC's e-learning tutorial on GC column selection at CHROMacademy.com
Page 126
An excerpt from LCGC's e-learning tutorial on GC column selection at CHROMacademy.com
In terms of selecting an appropriate stationary phase, there are four primary analyte or stationary-phase interactions that need to be considered.
Dispersive interactions (<<1 kJ/mol) are lower energy (van der Waals) forces between nonpolar moieties of the analyte molecule, that is, C–H bonds and so on. These will be in play when using any silica-based stationary phase because the majority of the phase polymeric backbone (polydimethylsiloxane [PDMS]) is nonpolar in nature.
Dipole–dipole and dipole–induced dipole interactions (3 and 1 kJ/mol, respectively) are in play whenever unsaturated, aromatic, or more-polar functional groups (that is, C–Cl or C–N bonds) are present in the stationary phase or analyte molecule. Stationary phases containing phenyl, cyano, or trifluoro functional groups are more polar than PDMS, and the more of these functional groups there are, the greater their influence is on the separation. The increase in retention of aromatic compounds and the relative decrease in retention of aliphatic analytes when moving from a 5% phenylmethyl PDMS phase to a 50% phenylmethyl PDMS phase exemplifies this.
Hydrogen bonding interactions (19 kJ/mol) are the strongest intermolecular forces in capillary gas chromatography (GC) and occur whenever the stationary phase contains cyano, trifluoro, or (especially) hydroxyl functional groups. This type of force is in play when analyzing alcohols using a polyethylene glycol or "wax" type phase.
Figure 1: The five most common GC column stationary-phase chemistries.
Pragmatic phase-selection rules can be summarized as follows:
How does one select the physical column dimensions of length (L), internal diameter, and film thickness (df)?
Column length affects the separation efficiency and therefore the resolution. Doubling column length doubles efficiency (number of theoretical plates [N]), doubles analysis time in isothermal separations (1.5–1.75× increase if using gradient temperature programming), doubles column cost, and increases resolution by a factor of 1.4. Increasing column length is the worst way to improve the resolution of a separation; however, when you have a sample with many components (hundreds) you sometimes need a long column. Select column length according to the number of species that need to be separated in the sample. For two components use a 10-m column, and for hundreds of components use a 60-m or 120-m column.
Column internal diameter affects retention and efficiency. Halve the column internal diameter, double the efficiency, and increase resolution by a factor of 1.4. This will double retention time only for isothermal separations and only if the film thickness in not altered. The phase ratio (β) is equal to the column radius (mm) divided by 2× the film thickness (µm). Keep the phase ratio constant between columns and the retention time will be approximately constant. Use β < 100 for highly volatile analytes and β > 400 for high-molecular-weight analytes or for trace analysis. Use smaller internal diameter columns when the separation is dependent on the stationary phase selectivity (analytes chemically very similar) or when multiple components need to be separated in shorter time-frames. Note that the column capacity will decrease as the column internal diameter is reduced.
Film thickness affects retention of analyte species, interaction with the silica tubing, phase bleed, and column capacity. Doubling the film thickness doubles retention time for isothermal analysis and increases retention by a factor of around 1.5 for temperature-programmed analysis. Doubling film thickness increases elution temperature by around 20 °C. Use thin films (0.1–0.25 µm) for trace analysis or when analytes are relatively involatile. Use thicker films (1–5 µm) when dealing with volatile analytes, analytes at high concentration, or when peak shape is poor. Note that increasing film thickness may compromise resolution for later-eluted analytes (retention factor > 5) and that phase bleed and column capacity increase with increasing film thickness.
Measuring Procyanidin Concentration in Wines Using UHPLC
January 24th 2025Researchers from the University of Bordeaux (Villenave d'Ornon, France) report the development and validation of a rapid and quantitative analytical method measuring crown procyanidin concentration in red and white wines using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with a ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer.
The Next Frontier for Mass Spectrometry: Maximizing Ion Utilization
January 20th 2025In this podcast, Daniel DeBord, CTO of MOBILion Systems, describes a new high resolution mass spectrometry approach that promises to increase speed and sensitivity in omics applications. MOBILion recently introduced the PAMAF mode of operation, which stands for parallel accumulation with mobility aligned fragmentation. It substantially increases the fraction of ions used for mass spectrometry analysis by replacing the functionality of the quadrupole with high resolution ion mobility. Listen to learn more about this exciting new development.
The Complexity of Oligonucleotide Separations
January 9th 2025Peter Pellegrinelli, Applications Specialist at Advanced Materials Technology (AMT) explains the complexity of oligonucleotide separations due to the unique chemical properties of these molecules. Issues such as varying length, sequence complexity, and hydrophilic-hydrophobic characteristics make efficient separations difficult. Separation scientists are addressing these challenges by modifying mobile phase compositions, using varying ion-pairing reagents, and exploring alternative separation modes like HILIC and ion-exchange chromatography. Due to these complexities, AMT has introduced the HALO® OLIGO column, which offers high-resolution, fast separations through its innovative Fused-Core® technology and high pH stability. Alongside explaining the new column, Peter looks to the future of these separations and what is next to come.
Testing Solutions for Metals and PFAS in Water
January 22nd 2025When it comes to water analysis, it can be challenging for labs to keep up with ever-changing testing regulations while also executing time-efficient, accurate, and risk-mitigating workflows. To ensure the safety of our water, there are a host of national and international regulators such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), World Health Organization (WHO), and the European Union (EU) that demand stringent testing methods for drinking water and wastewater. Those methods often call for fast implementation and lengthy processes, as well as high sensitivity and reliable instrumentation. This paper explains how your ICP-MS, ICP-OES, and LC-MS-MS workflows can be optimized for compliance with the latest requirements for water testing set by regulations like US EPA methods 200.8, 6010, 6020, and 537.1, along with ISO 17294-2. It will discuss the challenges faced by regulatory labs to meet requirements and present field-proven tips and tricks for simplified implementation and maximized uptime.