
News|Videos|June 22, 2025
Minimizing Blanks and Lowering Detection Limits
Advertisement
In Episode 5, the panelists take a deep dive into one of the most critical aspects of PFAS analysis: minimizing background contamination and achieving lower detection limits. They discuss the pervasive issue of blanks—unintended contamination that can skew results—and the importance of rigorous quality control in both laboratory environments and analytical workflows.
To watch the full series of videos from this peer exchange,
Episodes in this series

Advertisement
Related to this article

Automated sequential tube sampling and chemometrics supplement GC–MS, adding time profiling and fast product-line comparison for real-world insight.

As PFAS analysis pushes into trace-level territory, laboratories face a fast-moving mix of vast chemical scope, method fragmentation, and background contamination.

Liquid chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC–IMS–HRMS) shows elephant seal pups carry more PFAS than their mothers do.

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and omics profiling distinguish duck and goose foie gras composition.

This week's Chromatography Online highlights include olive waste antioxidant recovery, food and tea analysis, EV isolation, mRNA vaccine purification, perfusion chromatography for oligonucleotides, mass spectrometry in teaching and career advice from “Women in Chromatography.”

Kinjal Bhatt and Ina Varfaj call AI a chromatography equalizer only if training and access keep pace, framing the risk as implementation, not technology.

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) reveal lasting brain cholesterol loss after myelin damage.
Advertisement
Advertisement






